Skip to content
About Us

Annual Report 0809

Printer friendly printout
ITSA Annual Report 2008–2009
© Commonwealth of Australia 2009.
ISSN 1441-4775
This work is copyright. Apart from any use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part may be reproduced by any process without prior written permission from the Commonwealth.
Requests and enquiries concerning reproduction and rights should be addressed to the Commonwealth Copyright Administration, Attorney General’s Department, Robert Garran Offices, National Circuit, Canberra ACT 2600 or posted at http://www.ag.gov.au/cca

Insolvency and Trustee Service Australia
GPO Box 821
Canberra ACT 2601
T: (02) 6270 3403
Internet: www.itsa.gov.au

Letter of Transmittal from the Chief Executive

Contents
Readers’ Guide
1. Overviews 2. Performance 3. Management and accountability 4. Appendices 5. Financial Statements 6. Glossaries and Index
FIGURES TABLES

Readers’ Guide
The Insolvency and Trustee Service Australia (ITSA) 2008–09 annual report has been prepared in accordance with the Requirements for Annual Reports, as approved by the Joint Committee of Public Accounts and Audit.

The body of the report is divided into the following sections:

Section 1

contains:
  • the Chief Executive’s review for 2008–09
  • the agency overview, including:
    - role and functions
    - organisational structure
    - outcome and outputs structure.

Section 2

contains reporting on the agency’s outcome–output performance information.

Section 3

contains reporting on corporate governance, external scrutiny, human resources management and financial resources management.

Section 4

contains appendices of other mandatory information, including reports required under specific legislation and additional information useful for providing a clearer picture of the agency’s activities during 2008–09.

Section 5

contains the audited financial statements for 2008–09.

Section 6

contains:
  • a list of abbreviations and acronyms
  • a glossary
  • a compliance index (for ease of locating mandatory requirements)
  • an index.
Further information about the annual report can be obtained by contacting:

Nikki Duvall
Client Services Coordinator
GPO Box 821
CANBERRA ACT 2601
Tel: (02) 6270 3434
Fax: (02) 6270 3413
Email: nikki.duvall@itsa.gov.au

1. Overviews
Chief Executive’s review
I am delighted to introduce the Annual Report for the Insolvency and Trustee Service Australia for 2008-09 having taken up the position in February 2009. As ITSA is an important agency at the frontline of the Government’s efforts to mitigate the effect of the global financial crisis on Australian’s suffering financial hardship, I was very happy to join the agency at such a critical time. I wish to thank David Bergman, the acting Chief Executive, from July 2008 to January 2009, for contributing to many of the initiatives and outcomes mentioned below.

As in past periods the incidence of new personal insolvency administrations provides a useful contextual background when reviewing ITSA’s achievements. In 2008-09 total activity under the Bankruptcy Act 1966, comprising bankruptcies, debt agreements and personal insolvency agreements, increased over the 2007-08 year by 11%, to 36,487. That level has again set a new high water mark against the previous peak in 2007-08 and reflects a 29% increase in the use of debt agreements as well as a 6% increase in bankruptcies.

For the past three years running, debt agreements have comprised about 20% of total insolvencies and this year increased to 23.5%. This again reflects the increasing confidence that larger institutional creditors have in the credibility of the debt agreement system following the introduction of the regulatory and compliance reforms in July 2007 and the importance we give to both liaison with the major stakeholders and practitioner development. By way of example, as well as regular formal and informal meetings with practitioners and key stakeholders, ITSA runs biannual stakeholder forums and practitioner development days.

This greater confidence by creditors in the debt agreement system is further evidenced by the increase in the acceptance rate by creditors of 86%, up from 71% in 2006-07 and 81% in 2007-08. In addition, there has been a significant reduction in the termination rates of debt agreements since the introduction of the reforms in July 2007. Under the “old system” more than 30% terminated prior to the end of the agreement. This compares with the “new system” where only 8% so far of new agreements entered into in 2007-08 were terminated during the last two years.

Integral to our registry and information functions we continue to meet client service standards in assisting the increasing numbers of debtors who contact us. Feedback from ITSA’s client opinion survey shows over 90% of debtors who present petitions were satisfied with the quality and timeliness of services ITSA provides, an 8% improvement from the 2005 survey, with room still for improvement. ITSA’s information service which provides a telephone, email and web information service, received 177,555 telephone enquiries, an increase of 6% from 2007-08.

ITSA’s role as the regulator of the personal insolvency system continued to be a focus during the year with our proactive program strongly supported by the representative industry body, the Insolvency Practitioners Association of Australia. As well as regulating the standards and practices of private registered trustees, the Official Trustee and registered debt agreement administrators, ITSA fulfils a compliance role, both at the registry interface in respect of new matters, and when supporting registered trustees through the issue of notices which assist bankruptcy trustees to administer their estates.

To assist in the regulation and compliance areas in September 2008 we launched a new practice and policy website for practitioners and other affected parties, issuing 41 new practice and policy statements. These cover our various functions and provide transparency and certainty for clients in understanding the basis on which we make decisions and exercise statutory powers. The policy statements also provide details of our expectations of trustees and debt agreement administrators; as well as provide interpretation of the law as they will be applied in regulating these practitioner groups.

Another of ITSA’s compliance responsibilities which supports confidence in the system is the Bankruptcy Fraud Investigation function. As in prior years the team has produced significant outcomes. Whilst referrals from trustees has marginally declined, a total of 239 people were convicted of committing offences under the Bankruptcy Act an increase of 10% from 2007-08. This included eight custodial sentences with three required to serve time in jail and five conditionally released. In a further 269 instances the efforts of the investigators who followed up alleged offence referrals resulted in parties complying with their responsibilities.

In its capacity as Official Trustee, ITSA has maintained the amount of dividends paid to creditors at $17.9 million. Contributors increased by 4% to 3,153 people and contributions collected increased by 18.1% to $12.9m. Contributions collected now represent 28% of all dividend payments made by the Official Trustee compared to 25% in 2007-08.

With respect to Proceeds of Crime, the number of pecuniary penalty and forfeiture orders rose by 67% from 75 in 2007-08 to 125 in 2008-09, the value of property under control at 30 June 2009 was $41.18 million and there was an increase in distributions with $16.95 million paid to the Confiscated Assets Account and the Confiscated Assets Special Account, an increase of 21% from 2007-08. A major seizure occurred in April 2009 when, as part of a joint AFP/Queensland Police operation, ITSA assisted in the seizure of property totalling $815,000 plus cash of $994,900.

In respect of our people, we continue to give high priority to ensuring that all of our employees are highly skilled and committed. We built upon the findings from the 2008 Employee Opinion Survey by conducting leadership development for the Executive Group and in October 2008 all teams in ITSA developed Team Action Plans to improve their team performance in terms of morale and well being, resulting in improved business outcomes. We have again conducted the annual Employee Opinion Survey to assess the success and effectiveness of those initiatives and await the results of that survey.

We have also made substantial progress during the year towards providing enhanced online services to our clients. We hope to substantially develop further our capability in this regard during the coming year.

The future
A notable change during the year was that responsibility for providing advice to the Attorney-General concerning personal insolvency policy and legislation was transferred from ITSA to the Attorney-General’s Department with effect from
1 February 2009. ITSA plans to continue to liaise closely with the Department and key stakeholders to assist in having policy development and legislative reforms appropriately informed by operational experience and stakeholder views.

Whilst there were no amendments made to the bankruptcy legislation during this period, ITSA progressed the preparation of amendments relating to the effectiveness of the offences provisions and amendments to improve the regime for the remuneration of registered trustees under the Bankruptcy Act 1966. In addition, in May 2009 the Attorney General announced a review of bankruptcy legislation aimed at lessening the incidence of bankruptcy by encouraging those in financial difficulty to obtain advice and information about their options before entering bankruptcy. Areas of the review included the dollar limits for debt agreements, the period of bankruptcy, the debt limit for creditor’s petitions and whether the bankruptcy register should remain a permanent public record. Implementing new legislation will be a significant part of future work.

With personal insolvency activity levels expected to increase over the next year as unemployment peaks following the global financial crisis, ITSA will continue to adapt to ensure service levels are maintained. ITSA’s restructure along five national business lines (operational from 1 July 2009) will facilitate seamless, consistent and efficient delivery of services to our clients and stakeholders, no matter where they are located.

This will result in a very significant positive change to the look and feel of the organisation and I look forward to the challenge of implementing the restructure and the harvesting of its benefits during the coming year.

Veronique Ingram
Chief Executive
September 2009


Agency overview
Role and functions
The Insolvency and Trustee Service Australia (ITSA) is an executive agency in the Attorney-General’s portfolio that administers and regulates Australia’s personal insolvency system.
ITSA’s outcome is to provide a personal insolvency system that minimises the impact of financial failure on the community, produces equitable outcomes for debtors and creditors and enjoys public confidence through application of bankruptcy laws, regulation and trustee services.

ITSA is responsible for administering the Bankruptcy Act 1966 and its related legislation, the Bankruptcy (Estate Charges) Act 1997. The Bankruptcy Act creates the roles of Inspector-General in Bankruptcy, Official Receiver and Official Trustee in Bankruptcy. ITSA fulfils each of these roles.

ITSA’s Chief Executive is also appointed as the Inspector-General in Bankruptcy. The Inspector-General is responsible for the general administration of the Bankruptcy Act and has powers to regulate bankruptcy trustees and debt agreement administrators, review decisions of trustees and investigate allegations of offences under the Act.

On behalf of the Official Receiver, ITSA operates a public bankruptcy registry service with compliance and coercive powers to assist bankruptcy trustees to discharge their responsibilities.
The Official Trustee in Bankruptcy, a body corporate, administers bankruptcies and other personal insolvency arrangements when a private trustee or other administrator is not appointed. ITSA provides personnel and resources to ensure the Official Trustee can fulfil its responsibilities.

The Official Trustee also has responsibility under the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 and the Customs Act 1901 to control and deal with property under court orders made under these statutes.
ITSA commenced the 2008–09 year with six outputs. They are listed on page 14; performance in relation to them is addressed in Section 2.

Organisational structure
ITSA’s senior management team is led by the Chief Executive. The Chief Executive was directly assisted by:
  • the Executive Director
  • the Adviser, Policy and Legislation (from 1 February 2009 the policy function was transferred to Attorney-General’s Department)
  • the five Official Receivers heading the state branch offices
  • the National Manager, Bankruptcy Regulation
  • the National Manager, Bankruptcy Fraud Investigation
  • the three heads of ITSA’s Corporate Services – the Chief Finance Officer, Chief Information Officer and Director Employee Relations.

ITSA has branch offices in each mainland capital city, with offices also in Hobart, Townsville and Canberra. The Northern Territory is serviced from the Adelaide office and through local arrangements in the territory. The Secretariat Branch is located mainly in Canberra.
Figure 1: Organisation chart
Organisation Chart - explanation as follows
The above chart illustrates ITSA’s structure during 2008–09. Official Receivers or branch heads were responsible for the performance of an operational state and territory branch and its use of resources. Across that branch structure ITSA operated three branch-managed functions to deliver services from all state and territory offices – registry and compliance, estate administration and proceeds of crime. Those functional lines enabled the development of consistent best practice across all state and territory offices.

There were also four nationally managed functions – Bankruptcy Regulation, the Debt Agreement Service, the Information Service, and Bankruptcy Fraud Investigation.
  • The Bankruptcy Regulation Branch operated independently from ITSA’s other functional roles, discharging the regulatory and review responsibilities of the Inspector-General in Bankruptcy under the Bankruptcy Act. Personnel were located in all mainland capital cities.
  • The Debt Agreement Service located in Brisbane, ensured that debt agreement proposals comply with the law, conducted the voting process with creditors and maintains the NPII in relation to debt agreements.
  • The Information Service, located in Adelaide, handle all pre-bankruptcy, most post-bankruptcy and general enquiries.
  • The Bankruptcy Fraud Investigation Unit, responsible for investigating all alleged offences under the Bankruptcy Act and preparing briefs for prosecution, has personnel located in Melbourne, Brisbane and Sydney.

Secretariat Branch coordinated and delivered executive support and a wide range of corporate services including legal, ministerial, financial management, information communication and technology, human resource management, contract and property management.

From March 2009, in preparation for a new business line structure, the Chief Executive established a more compact National Management Board to oversee corporate governance, make decisions on strategic business management, and provide advice on performance within the agency. The Board comprises the Chief Executive, national managers of ITSA’s five new business lines and the Chief Financial Officer.

Further information about the purpose of the new structure and its development is given at Section 3.

2008–09 Outcome and Output Structure
2008–09 Outcome and Output Structure Chart - Explanation on 2.Performance onwards
Changes were made to the outcome and outputs during 2008–09. The outcome statement was altered following a review conducted jointly with the Department of Finance and Deregulation, and from 1 February 2009, responsibility for Output 1.1 was transferred to the Attorney-General’s Department.

2. Performance
Output 1.1: Personal insolvency laws which satisfy business and community needs
Overview
In line with the usual departmental approach to portfolio agencies, responsibility for providing advice to the Attorney-General concerning personal insolvency policy and legislation was transferred from ITSA to the Attorney-General’s Department with effect from 1 February 2009. ITSA liaises closely with the Department and will continue to collaborate with the personal insolvency sector on matters of administration. Such liaison will assist in having policy development and legislative reforms appropriately informed by operational experience and which take account of administrative practicalities affecting implementation.

The following discussion in relation to Output 1.1, to the extent it relates to advice on policy and legislation, covers the period 1 July 2008 to 31 January 2009 and should be read with the transfer of responsibility in mind.

No amendments were made to the bankruptcy legislation during the year. However, during this time ITSA progressed the preparation of amendments announced by the Attorney-General in March 2008 relating to the effectiveness of the offences provisions in the Bankruptcy Act 1966, and amendments announced by the Attorney-General in May 2008 to improve the regime for the remuneration of registered trustees under the Bankruptcy Act 1966. These proposed amendments were described in ITSA’s 2007–08 annual report.

Strategies
The following strategies were employed to meet Output 1.1:
  • Reform proposals: Evaluate personal insolvency legislation and recommend measures to simplify it and keep it up to date.
  • Consultation: Regularly consult personal insolvency system stakeholders about personal insolvency laws.
  • Education: Develop and deliver training and education programs to practitioners on new and existing laws and practices.
Reform proposals
Performance measure:Timely advice to government on options to improve and simplify the legislation
Up until 31 January 2009, ITSA shared responsibility for advising the government on bankruptcy policy with the Office of Legal Services Coordination in the Attorney-General’s Department. Since that time the Bankruptcy Policy Branch of the department has primary responsibility for this task.

In accordance with an agreement setting out how ITSA and the Attorney-General’s Department will work together in relation to policy development after 31 January 2009 there has been continued collaboration in advancing the government’s reform agenda and assisting with significant policy issues.

Consultation
Performance measure:Consultation acknowledged by stakeholders as effective and constructive
ITSA continued to consult extensively with members of the Bankruptcy Reform Consultative Forum on proposals to reform the bankruptcy system. ITSA chaired the Forum prior to 1 February 2009. This role was transferred to the Attorney-General’s Department from that date as part of the transfer of responsibility for advising on policy and legislative reform. The forum met twice during 2008–09, in September 2008 and April 2009. The forum comprises representatives of the following key stakeholders:
  • Law Council of Australia
  • Insolvency Practitioners Association
  • Australian Bankers’ Association
  • Australian Finance Conference
  • Australian Financial Counsellors and Credit Reform Association
  • Abacus (representing credit unions and mutual building societies)
  • Australian Taxation Office.

Members of the forum have indicated that they value this consultative process and appreciate the opportunity to be involved in policy development from an early stage.
Apart from participation in the forum, ITSA also engaged in regular, less formal consultation with registered trustees, other insolvency practitioners and financial counsellors across Australia. This liaison provided further opportunities to discuss new developments, and to receive suggestions for improvement on practical aspects of proposals including those proposed in response to the growing number of consumer debtors affected by the global financial crisis.

Education
ITSA continues to conduct regular information sessions for various client and stakeholder groups. The focus during the year has remained on ensuring the effectiveness of the new debt agreement regime which commenced on 1 July 2007. To this end there were further meetings with the major creditors involved in debt agreements and another professional development day was held in March by ITSA for debt agreement administrators.
Cost recovery
The Bankruptcy Legislation Amendment (Fees and Charges) Act 2006 altered the mechanism for setting fees and charges payable under the bankruptcy legislation. They are now set by the Attorney-General in legislative instruments made for that purpose. This provides greater flexibility and responsiveness when there is a need to keep fees and charges in line with costs. The fees and charges that applied from 1 July 2006 were introduced following a comprehensive review of all ITSA’s fees and charges to ensure they appropriately reflected the costs of providing the services to which they relate. In line with the government’s cost-recovery policy, ITSA undertook to conduct a biennial review of all fees and charges. However, it may be necessary to undertake reviews more frequently if the cost of providing any of ITSA’s services changes significantly.

The first biennial review conducted in 2007–08 resulted in minor changes to ITSA’s fees and charges. The current fees and charges are set out in the Bankruptcy (Fees and Remuneration) Determination 2008. The next biennial review is scheduled for 2009–10.

International engagement
ITSA is a member of the International Association of Insolvency Regulators (IAIR). ITSA provides secretariat services for the association which has 28 member agencies from countries around the world. Its purpose is to promote liaison, cooperation and discussion among member agencies and to be recognised as an international body with knowledge and credibility to promote fair and effective systems for the administration of insolvencies. ITSA contributed to two comparative studies in 2008–09 relating to secured creditors and development of professional standards. These two projects were commissioned by the association at its 2008 meeting in St Petersburg and reports on the projects will be presented at the association’s meeting in Johannesburg in October 2009. Other projects undertaken by IAIR in recent years include comparative studies on user fees and charges and approaches to consumer bankruptcy. Reports on IAIR projects can be found on its website at <www.insolvencyreg.org>.

General performance measure:Client and stakeholder satisfaction with amendments to legislation and improvements to practices, as measured by periodic client opinion surveys
A new client opinion survey was conducted during 2008–09 and showed continued satisfaction with the level of information provided by ITSA. The publishing of general rulings and practice notes was universally regarded as helpful by professional clients.
During 2008–09, ITSA continued to publish practice statements and directions on the Practice and Policy page of the ITSA website. This was in response to calls from professional clients for more information about how decisions are made within ITSA and to provide guidance on bankruptcy law and practice. There are now 41 statements and directions available for clients on this webpage.
Professional clients continued to see the provision of regular consultation as an important issue. As there were no changes to bankruptcy legislation during the year there was a reduction in the level of formal consultations held.
ITSA continued to perform well in relation to listening and responding appropriately to professional client needs. ITSA will continue to engage and consult with professional clients in the future both to improve its operations and also to provide input to policy and legislation developments managed by the Attorney-General’s Department.
Output 1.2: A public bankruptcy registry service and compliance with the Bankruptcy Act
Overview
ITSA provides an information and registry service where debtors can obtain information about dealing with unmanageable debt, lodge petitions to become bankrupt and propose debt agreements or personal insolvency agreements.

Clients can call ITSA’s 1300 number to obtain information and forms or enquire about their personal insolvency administration. Clients can also seek information or request forms and documents using email, webmail and fax or by attending one of ITSA’s registries in person.

ITSA’s registries provide other services including issuing Bankruptcy Notices, exercising Official Receiver powers and maintaining the National Personal Insolvency Index (NPII) which is the permanent record of all personal insolvency administrations in Australia.

Strategies
Output 1.2 was delivered by three business units within ITSA – Information Service, Bankruptcy Registry & Compliance and the Debt Agreement Service. The three units achieved this output through four broad strategies:
  • Information: Providing accessible, timely and accurate information about personal insolvency to assist debtors, creditors and the broader community to make informed decisions about bankruptcy and its alternatives. This includes providing information on ITSA’s practices and policies.
  • Registry: Accepting or rejecting new personal insolvency administrations including debtors’ petitions and debt agreement proposals, issuing bankruptcy notices and accepting or rejecting declarations of intention to present a debtor’s petition.
  • National Personal Insolvency Index: Maintaining an accurate and readily accessible database of personal insolvency events – the NPII.
  • Compliance: Encouraging and compelling debtors and third parties to comply with their obligations under the Bankruptcy Act.
Information
Performance measure: Debtors make an informed decision on dealing with unmanageable debt
ITSA’s Information Service provides a first point of contact for people seeking information and options to deal with unmanageable debt. It answers all calls to ITSA on its 1300 telephone number and responds to all correspondence enquiries submitted through ITSA’s webmail service.

Clients contacting the Information Service obtain relevant and accurate information as employees working in the Information Service participate in an extensive induction and training program covering aspects of bankruptcy and its alternatives. Our employees are also supported by a suite of readily accessible reference materials.

During 2008–09, there was increased client contact with the Information Service:
· 6% in 1300 telephone calls
· 65% in correspondence received
· 35% in hits to ITSA’s website.
The Information Service internal standard of answering 80% of calls within 30 seconds was not met this year. This was due to the increased client use of this service and telephone hardware problems which were rectified in May 2009. Fifty-three per cent of calls were answered within 30 seconds and the average wait time for calls was 2 minutes and 14 seconds.

Following initial contact, the Information Service issued over 48,249 (44,432 in 2007–08) debtor packs and facts sheets to clients outlining the options available to deal with unmanageable debt. In addition, approximately 26,800 pieces of correspondence were received and actioned, with over 90% being actioned within 24 hours of receipt. This service ensures clients have the latest information and forms available to them.

ITSA met its performance standard of providing over-the-counter general information within 10 minutes and dispatching documents within one day.

TABLE 1: Levels of enquiry activity
2007–08
2008–09
Telephone enquiries answered
167,509
177,555
Correspondence enquiries actioned
16,233
26,873
Website hits per month
686,323
931,494
Online and electronic services
There was a 4% increase in unique visitors to ITSA’s website, located at www.itsa.gov.au during 2008–09. Visitors downloaded a total of 67,760 information sheets and forms per month, with an average visitor spending around nine minutes viewing our content.

In November 2008 ITSA launched a dedicated email address for enquiries – info@itsa.gov.au. Clients can use this email address to seek information, obtain documents, raise issues, provide feedback and/or lodge complaints. ITSA also has an online contact form as an alternative, particularly where clients are accessing the Internet from a public arena.

ITSA has also made substantial progress towards providing enhanced services to our clients online. From July 2009 practitioners have been able to perform core insolvency-related tasks online, such as:
  • finalising, reactivating and viewing details of current administrations
  • generating Certificates of Appointment
  • submitting realisations and interest charge payment information.

This is the first phase in an extensive suite of online services. Electronic access to ITSA’s services and information remains an increasingly important means of communicating with our clients.
Registry
Performance measure:Approximately 30,000 new personal insolvency administrations registered and processed annually
ITSA registers all debt agreements, personal insolvency agreements and bankruptcy administrations.

TABLE 2: Levels of registry services activity
2006–07
2007–08
2008–09
Declarations of intent lodged
374
441
892
Debt agreements
    Proposals accepted for voting
9,187
8,309
10,528
    Proposals not accepted for voting
0
803
825
    New debt agreements made
6,942
6,542
8,567
    Acceptance rate by creditors
71%
81%
86%
Personal insolvency agreements made
217
277
437
Debtors’ petitions accepted
23,028
23,682
25,370
Sequestration orders made
2,210
2,288
2,113
Total administrations registered (DA made, PIAs, DPs and SOs)
32,397
32,789
36,487

Declarations of intention to present a debtor’s petition
A debtor is also able to seek temporary relief from recovery action taken by a creditor by presenting a declaration of intention to present a debtor’s petition. Once such a declaration is accepted by ITSA it prevents unsecured creditors from enforcing their debts for seven days, during which time debtors are able to consider their options under the Bankruptcy Act.

There was over a 100% increase in the use of declarations of intent in 2008–09. This increase is a likely outcome of the economic climate. It would seem that debtors are more closely examining their financial situation and considering the available insolvency options to help ease their unmanageable debt.
Part IX Debt Agreements – ITSA’s Debt Agreement Service
Debt agreements result from creditors voting to accept a proposal to compromise debts of debtors with unmanageable debt. To be eligible to propose a debt agreement a debtor must be insolvent and have unsecured debts and assets (not exempt in bankruptcy) below $83,647 and after-tax income below $62,735.

ITSA’s Debt Agreement Service (DAS) receives debt agreement proposals, conducts the voting with creditors and maintains the NPII record in regard to debt agreements.

Administrators and creditors use the DAS telephone helpline service to obtain information and guidance on practice about proposals. This in turn enables debtors to make well-informed decisions to suit their circumstances.

Debt agreement proposals are received from debt agreement administrators who provide debtors with information on options to deal with unmanageable debt and the consequences of these options. The administrator assists the debtor to prepare debt agreement proposal forms and must certify that reasonable grounds exist to believe that the debtor is likely to be able to pay the amount offered and has disclosed all information required.

ITSA performs an extensive service to fulfil the requirements of the Bankruptcy Act so that there is confidence in the debtors’ capability to maintain the repayments proposed.

After the DAS checks the debtor’s eligibility, further compliance checks are made to ensure the debtor is insolvent; the proposal clearly shows the debtor’s offer to creditors; conditions in the proposal are able to be met within seven days of acceptance by creditors and the debtor has disclosed information to enable creditors to make an informed voting decision.

The DAS compliance program aims to improve knowledge and practice relating to debt agreement proposals. Compliance telephone calls are made by DAS employees to debtors and administrators to clarify proposals and check compliance with requirements and to creditors to check their claim and voting eligibility. The DAS published nine Practice Statements which describe the way ITSA performs functions and exercises powers conferred on the Official Receiver under the Bankruptcy Act and also distributes a bi-monthly newsletter on practice relating to proposals to clients. The newsletter is also available on the ITSA website.

The DAS works closely with creditors and regularly meets – individually with major creditor clients – to inform them of their individual response and acceptance rates and improve their support of the debt agreement system. The DAS organises a six-monthly major creditor forum to enable progress of the debt agreement system to be monitored by large institutional creditors, the Australian Bankers Association and the Australian Finance Conference. Administrators endorsed the importance of the major creditor forum and individual visits to improve support for the debt agreement system in the 2009 ITSA Client Opinion Survey.

The number of debt agreement proposals accepted to send to creditors for voting increased by 27% in 2008–09. The number of new debt agreements made increased by 30% in 2008–09.

The increased use of debt agreements as an option for debtors in dealing with unmanageable debt appears to result from changes to the debt agreement system in July 2007 –
  • debt agreement administrators certifying that they have reasonable grounds to believe the debtor is able to afford payments offered
  • proposals disclosing the relevant information needed by creditors to make informed decision on voting
  • the registration of administrators and increased regulation of the duties of administrators.

The overall effect had been to improve confidence in the debt agreement system shown by an increase in the acceptance rate by creditors to 86% of proposals sent to them for voting.

Debt agreements now represent 23.5% of all personal insolvency administrations.

The Debt Agreement Service has performance measures for notification of new proposals and electronic notification processes now enable a significant improvement in promptness of notification. In recent times DAS has been able to process the initial debt agreement proposal and send a report to creditors within three days in 67% of matters; and within five days in 92% of matters.
Personal insolvency agreements
A personal insolvency agreement results from creditors voting to accept a proposal from a debtor to compromise their debts. Unlike debt agreements, personal insolvency agreements are not subject to income, asset or debt thresholds. However, they are subject to an extensive process of investigation and reporting by a trustee prior to creditors voting.

There was a 48% increase in agreements made in 2008–09. One reason for this increase could be the declining economic conditions with more debtors being placed in financial stress and reaching a settlement with their creditors to avoid bankruptcy.

Bankruptcy by debtors’ petitions and sequestration orders
ITSA accepts and rejects applications from debtors to become voluntarily bankrupt (debtors’ petitions). It also receives notification of court orders making a debtor involuntarily bankrupt (a sequestration order).
There were 21 instances in 2008–09 when a petition was rejected by an Official Receiver as an abuse of the bankruptcy system. In a number of other instances enquiries made of debtors about their circumstances and their ability to deal with their circumstances, outside of the bankruptcy system, have resulted in them withdrawing their petitions. These withdrawn applications are not included in the figure above.

ITSA’s performance standard of accepting or rejecting debtors’ petitions within one day of receipt of all necessary documentation could not be met in all instances this year. This was due to increased petitions presented with 25,387 being accepted (23,683 in 2007–08) in 2008–09. An additional procedure ITSA adopted this year to scan all documents has also impacted on meeting this measure. Approximately 85% of petitions were processed in the required timeframe of one day, with the remaining petitions being processed within five days.

TABLE 3: Debt agreements, personal insolvency agreements and bankruptcies as a proportion of all personal insolvency administrations
Debt agreements
Personal insolvency agreements
Bankruptcies (including Part XI –administration of deceased estates)
Total
No.
%
No.
%
No.
%
No.
2001–02
3,294
11.8
454
1.6
24,109
86.6
27,857
2002–03
4,550
16.5
405
1.4
22,637
82.1
27,592
2003–04
5,487
20.8
302
1.2
20,496
78.0
26,285
2004–05
4,738
18.6
207
0.8
20,501
80.6
25,446
2005–06
4,848
17.7
182
0.6
22,299
81.7
27,329
2006–07
6,516
20.3
217
0.7
25,238
79.0
31,971
2007–08
6,618
20.2
277
0.9
25,970
78.9
32,865
2008–09
8,567
23.5
437
1.1
27,483
75.4
36,487
National Personal Insolvency Index
Performance measure: The National Personal Insolvency Index is accurate and up to date
The NPII is the permanent electronic register of all personal insolvency administrations in Australia. It is maintained by ITSA and contains details of creditors’ petitions, bankruptcies, debt agreements, and personal insolvency agreements.
The public and businesses can search the NPII on payment of a fee. Searches are conducted predominantly through index search agents. As well as providing a basis for information used to conduct credit checks, searches may be conducted, for instance, by a purchaser’s solicitor enquiring as to the vendor’s title to a property, or by employers checking the background of a prospective employee.

There was around a 10% decrease in the number of searches undertaken by the public and business in 2008–09. More than 94% of searches were conducted online using an index search agent. The number of searches performed appears to be proportional to the level of economic activity (new contracts, new employment, etc), and with the slowing of the Australian economy there has been a reduction in the volume of searches conducted.

TABLE 4: NPII searches
2006–07
2007–08
2008–09
NPII searches conducted
296,533
343,855
309,799
Compliance
Bankruptcy notices
Performance measure:Bankruptcy notices are issued within one business day of receiving a completed application
A bankruptcy notice is a demand for payment of a judgment debt. Bankruptcy notices are issued by ITSA on the application of a creditor. Non-compliance with a bankruptcy notice constitutes an ‘act of bankruptcy’ which can be relied on by a creditor to apply to the Federal Court or Federal Magistrates Court to make a debtor bankrupt.

ITSA continued to meet its performance standard of issuing bankruptcy notices within one day of receipt of settled notices from creditors’ solicitors.

Official Receiver notices
Performance measure:Official Receiver powers are effective and exercised within prescribed or agreed standards
The Official Receiver can issue notices to bankrupts, debtors or third parties requiring them to provide information, attend to give information under oath, give access to premises, deliver assets or make contribution payments. The notices are issued on the application of a trustee to assist in the administration of a bankrupt estate.

ITSA continued to meet its performance standard of issuing notices within one day of receipt of settled notices from trustees.
TABLE 5: Bankruptcy notices and Official Receiver notices
2006–07
2007–08
2008–09
Bankruptcy notices issued
10,981
10,060
10,612
Official Receiver notices issued
455
398
362

Clients
General performance measure:Client satisfaction as measured by periodic client opinion surveys

Information and registry services
Feedback from the 2009 Client Opinion Survey indicates that all clients rate ITSA as providing a good level of information and service through the 1300 number and by email.
Clients made bankrupt by a Debtor Petition – in comparison to clients made bankrupt by a Creditor Petition – rate the level of service provided by the Information Service higher, by an average 17% against timeliness, employees and quality of service.

Bankrupt clients rated increased satisfaction levels with the quality of service, the timeliness of responding and the conduct of employees they dealt with.

Bankrupt clients seek to source information and documents from ITSA’s website, with the ability to lodge documents on line.

Bankrupt clients are also satisfied that they are properly and adequately informed about the consequences of bankruptcy and what can and cannot be done once bankrupt.

Debtors are indicating that they are approached less by creditors after becoming bankrupt. This is a positive outcome as it reflects the effectiveness of the Bankruptcy Act to offer protection from creditors once a client has entered into an insolvency option, providing some relief to the debtor’s financial situation.

Professional clients consider provision of accurate information as one of the most important attributes of ITSA’s services. These clients seek improvement in the promptness of service, responding to client needs and ensuring that information is relevant and easy to understand. ITSA continues to have regular contact and consultation with the professional clients and will investigate these and other opportunities for improvement.
Website
ITSA’s website at www.itsa.gov.au provides information to the general public, potential and existing clients and professional clients. The website is a resource that can assist with:
  • insolvency options
  • sourcing information
  • answers to FAQs
  • forms and documents
  • statistics and reports.

Seventy per cent of clients made bankrupt from a creditors petition have access to the Internet; while 37% of these clients use ITSA’s website.

The use of ITSA’s website is becoming more popular each year as clients want to be able to access information outside of normal business hours. ITSA is continually adding more information and features to the website to ensure easy access and navigation by clients. Of all clients who accessed ITSA’s website, a strong majority found what they wanted reasonably easily.

NPII
Of the four client groups asked about the NPII, personal access varied greatly, with the proportion of client groups accessing it generally decreasing since the 2005 client survey:
  • 24% for creditors (compared with 38% in 2005)
  • 27% for debt agreement administrators (compared with 14% in 2005)
  • 39% for registered trustees (compared with 41% in 2005)
  • 47% for users of registry services (compared with 67% in 2005).

There were higher satisfaction levels with the NPII’s search capability since the last client survey and a majority of debt agreement administrators and registered trustees who responded to the current survey indicated they were satisfied with the searches provided by their agent.

NPII users, who were not totally satisfied with the search service, offered the following suggestions for improvement:
  • having the ability to obtain multiple records for common names
  • alternative search options where a name has been misspelt
  • searches to be free or at a lower cost.

ITSA continues its work on the NPII project set up in October 2006 to examine and recommend on NPII products, service delivery and methods of data integrity improvement. Implementation of project recommendations aimed at increasing data accuracy and standardising extracts has been ongoing during 2008 and 2009. It is hoped that increased client satisfaction will continue as a result of new NPII products and options.
Output 1.3: Regulation of bankruptcy trustees and debt agreement administrators
Overview
The regulatory responsibilities of the Inspector-General in Bankruptcy are aimed at ensuring high national standards of bankruptcy practice and procedure. These functions are undertaken by ITSA’s Bankruptcy Regulation Branch, which oversees registered trustees in private practice, ITSA’s trustee function (the Official Trustee), debt agreement administrators, and solicitors who act as trustees in personal insolvency agreements. The branch acts independently from ITSA trustee areas and reports directly to the Inspector-General.

The branch licenses those trustees and debt agreement administrators required to be registered by law; monitors the ongoing eligibility of unregistered people who, in limited circumstances, can act as trustees of personal insolvency agreements; inspects the systems and files of practitioners (including the Official Trustee); and investigates complaints about activities and applies sanctions when appropriate.

The branch also fulfils the Inspector-General’s administrative review role, determining applications for review of decisions made by trustees.

The following strategies are employed to meet Output 1.3:
  • Monitoring practitioner standards: Monitor the standard of bankruptcy trustees and debt agreement administrators and their administrations through a targeted program of inspection of their files, systems and practices.
  • Investigating complaints: Investigate complaints about practitioners, utilising alternative dispute resolution where possible, and take remedial action when warranted.
  • Registration of trustees and debt agreement administrators: Ensure that only suitably qualified people are licensed to practise as registered trustees and as registered debt agreement administrators.
  • Monitoring other administrators not required to be registered: Assess the eligibility of solicitors who act as controlling trustees and people who act as unregistered debt agreement administrators.
  • Review of trustee decisions: Perform the Inspector-General in Bankruptcy’s administrative review function of conducting statutory reviews of specified trustee decisions.

Summary
During the year, Bankruptcy Regulation Branch inspected 198 practitioners; requested remedial action of 22 trustees and nine debt agreement administrators; finalised 229 complaints; finalised 12 applications to be registered as a trustee and 16 applications to be registered as debt agreement administrators; commenced disciplinary proceedings in respect of one registered trustee and two debt agreement administrators and finalised 77 reviews of trustee decisions.

Inspection program for trustees and debt agreement administrators
Performance measure:Achievement of target inspection program covering the administrations of approximately 210 bankruptcy trustees and debt agreement administrators and 1,100 administrations annually

The purpose of this proactive program is to evaluate the qualitative standard of trusteeship and administration. In 2008–09 Bankruptcy Regulation Branch maintained its focus on inspections of higher-risk trustees and on registered debt agreement administrators as an emerging and developing profession with a significant number of new entrants and increasing consumer utilisation of the debt agreement provisions of the Act. Bankruptcy Regulation’s targeted inspection activities resulted in several major enforcement projects being initiated in 2008–09. This resulted in a decision being made to defer the Official Trustee inspection program until 2009–10.
TABLE 6: Number of practitioners and their administrations inspected
2007–08
2008–09
Number of trustees inspected
180
169
Number of debt agreement administrators inspected
38
29
Total number of trustees and administrators inspected (Programmed inspections 210)
218
198
Number of active registered trustees administrations inspected
618
426
Number of debt agreement administrators administrations inspected
645
441
Number of Official Trustee administrations inspected
303
0
Total number of administrations inspected
(Programmed inspections 1,100)
1,566
867
To educate trustees and improve standards in areas where errors occur regularly, the branch analyses the incidence of non-compliance. It records them in three categories depending on the level of seriousness. Information about common errors, and articles advising correct practice, are published in the branch’s newsletter. This is sent electronically to all registered trustees and debt agreement administrators. These issues are also raised at regular information sessions with practitioners in each state and territory.
BR’s commitment to ongoing education
During 2008–09, Bankruptcy Regulation Branch (BR) has continued its leading role in the education and development of personal insolvency industry stakeholders. In the financial year, BR conducted in excess of 30 information sessions and professional development days reaching over 500 members of the personal insolvency community. These stakeholders included registered trustees and debt agreement administrators and their employees, financial counsellors and major creditors.
In September 2008 the ITSA Practice and Policies website was launched. This website lists ITSA’s various functions and policy documents and provides transparency and certainty for clients in understanding the basis on which ITSA makes decisions. It also includes I-G practice statements to assist practitioners in interpreting difficult areas of legislation. All ITSA stakeholders are encouraged to access these documents.
BR remains committed to offering a variety of education formats for stakeholders. In addition to delivering regular information sessions and professional developments days, and publishing new practices and policies documents, BR will continue to publish the Personal Insolvency Regulator newsletter on a regular basis.

TABLE 7: Non-compliance issues identified
2007–08
2008–09
Registered trustees:
Number of errors identified
349
362
Number of trustees requested to take remedial action
27
22
Percentage of administrations inspected with no errors
71%
52%
Registered debt agreement administrators
Number of errors identified
87
55
Number of administrators requested to take remedial action
N/A
9
Registered trustees
While there has been an increase in the number of errors identified in 2008–09, the overall number of instances when it was appropriate to request specific remedial action has declined. Nevertheless, the identification of some instances of serious non-compliance has resulted in some major enforcement projects being initiated by the branch.
Non-compliance in administration by practitioners is reported in three categories, A, B and C – depending on their level of materiality and effect. Of the 362 issues identified:
  • 12 (0)1 were classified as Category A – considered most serious and warranting disciplinary proceedings.
  • 55 (29) were classified as Category B – serious or systemic issues that warrant immediate remedial action.
  • 295 (320) were classified as Category C – one-off procedural issues that did not have a significant impact on creditors.

The major areas where non-compliance occurred were errors relating to property or asset investigations and income assessments 24% (14%); inadequate communications 23% (30%); failing to maintain proper records 12% (10%); errors in the calculation of the realisations and interest charge 9% (7%) and problems with the convening of meetings 9% (11%) .
The increase in errors relating to property or asset investigations and income assessments, in part, relates to a small number of matters in which disciplinary proceedings are contemplated. These matters were under investigation at 30 June. The reduction in the percentage of errors relating to communication is pleasing and appears to reflect the focus given to educating practitioners in prior years.

1The figures in brackets refer to 2007–08 statistics
Trustee withdraws unnecessary objections
In keeping with its industry surveillance role, Bankruptcy Regulation utilised the NPII data to produce reports developed with assistance from ITSA’s IT team, indicating unusual patterns in the lodgement of objections to discharge. An analysis was undertaken of objections entered by all trustees for the three calendar years from 2006 to 2008. An individual trustee had entered some 40 objections to discharge in respect to matters where otherwise the administration was finalised. In each case the purpose of the objection was to induce the bankrupts to file a Statement of Affairs. After Bankruptcy Regulation contacted the trustee and discussed matters in which it appeared the trustee was unnecessarily maintaining objections, the trustee agreed to withdraw the majority of the objections identified. The effect is that the bankrupts concerned will be bankrupt for three years from the date on which they filed their Statement of Affairs rather than eight years had the objection remained effective.
Monitoring and attendance at creditor meetings
Bankruptcy Regulation Branch also monitors personal insolvency agreement proposals and attends meetings of creditors to determine the legitimacy of proposals and to ensure that procedures comply with the Act.

In 2008–09, the branch reviewed 302 Part X proposals and attended 58 creditors’ meetings, compared to 329 and 35 respectively in 2007–08. Intervention and corrective action was required in 5% of the Part X matters reviewed, compared to 10% in 2007–08. Non-compliance generally comprised failing to report adequately or to make sufficient enquiries and incorrect treatment of creditor’s claims. Remedial actions by trustees included supplementary reports to creditors and correction of procedural deficiencies prior to, or at the time of the meeting.

Official Trustee
As outlined previously, due to a number of enforcement projects commenced in 2008–09, a decision was made to defer the Official Trustee inspection program until 2009-10.

Registered debt agreement administrators
In March 2009, ITSA’s Bankruptcy Regulation Branch held its second professional development forum for administrators where current issues and Inspector-General requirements were discussed at length.

Of the 55 errors found in DAA administrations as a result of the inspection program:
  • 2 (7)2 were classified as Category A
  • 13 (27) were classified as Category B
  • 40 (53) were classified as Category C.

The major areas where errors occurred were incorrect certifications 40% (27%); record keeping and accounting issues 15% (15%); and in connection with fees taken 9% (9%). There was a reduction in the rate of failure to report the three month arrears 7% (14%); and in dealing with creditor’s claims 9% (18%).

The Category A errors comprised failures by an individual, unregistered administrator and failures by an associated company, a registered administrator. The conduct involved failure to keep books and records to fully and correctly account for administration, failing to deal with property in the manner specified in the debt agreement, a failure to reconcile trust monies, and failing to carry out duties including certification, reporting defaults and terminations. This led to disciplinary actions against each administrator, resulting in a declaration of ineligibility and a deregistration.
Back to table of content

2The figures in brackets refer to 2007–08 statistics
Complaints
Performance measure:Complaints handled within set timeframes
Bankruptcy Regulation Branch handles complaints made by debtors and creditors about the conduct of bankruptcy trustees and debt agreement administrators.

All complaints received are examined and, where possible, quickly finalised without the need for in-depth investigations or a report being requested from the trustee or administrator.

Complainants may be:
  • informed that the trustee’s or administrator’s conduct is valid under the Bankruptcy Act and complies with the expected standards of conduct
  • directed to their trustee or administrator for additional information, or
  • given information about the alternative and appropriate remedies available to them.

The remaining complaints are investigated and if deficiencies are identified, the remedial action taken usually involves counselling, disciplinary proceedings, and/or direct intervention in the trustee’s or administrator’s conduct of the particular administration or litigation. The branch also looks for opportunities to utilise negotiation and alternative dispute resolution techniques to achieve an outcome.
Facilitating outcomes in complaint handling

This year Bankruptcy Regulation (BR) has continued to become involved earlier to facilitate negotiated settlements of dispute.

In one particular example, a bankrupt made contact with BR as she believed her trustee had no basis for seeking to recover from her family members the substance of an antecedent transaction. The bankrupt was clearly apprehensive about maintaining any contact or cooperating with her trustee. At this time the bankrupt had also not filed her Statement of Affairs although she had been bankrupt for only one week.

In dealing with the bankrupt, BR impressed upon her the need to file her Statement of Affairs as soon as possible and explained to her the effect and meaning of the antecedent transaction legislation. We also advised her of the opportunities for an annulment if sufficient funds could be raised to pay creditors, as well as the costs of the administration in full.

Within seven weeks of making contact with BR the bankrupt filed her Statement of Affairs, resumed contact with her trustee and received a Section 153A annulment after having paid all of her debts in full.

BR will continue to look for opportunities to assist in early settlement of disputes and invites all practitioners to bring potential matters to BR’s attention when they believe having an independent third party involved might assist resolution.


TABLE 8: All practitioners – complaints
2007–08
2008–09
Number of complaints received
378
418
Percentage of complaints found to be justified
11%
17%
Number of complaints not requiring investigation
172
189
Complaints not requiring investigation finalised within 14 days (standard 80%)
84%
100%
Number of complaints investigated
206
229
Actual percentage of investigative complaints finalised within 60 days (Standard 80%)
84%
85%
The 11% increase in complaints received by the branch is attributable to an increase in complaints concerning trustees, whereas complaints against administrators have decreased marginally.
Trustee complaints
Of the 418 complaints received in 2008–09, 310 were against registered trustees and the Official Trustee (266 in 2007–08).

These complaints encompass six main areas:
  • lack of information or responsiveness 25%
  • decisions concerning the claiming or disposal of assets 20%
  • the extent of trustees’ fees and costs 18%
  • delays in the administration or lack of action 15%
  • inappropriate conduct or conflict of interest 10%
  • income and contribution liability assessments 6%

Registered debt agreement administrator complaints
Of the 108 complaints made against debt agreement administrators (112 in 2007–08), 61 required investigation (35 in 2007–08). In addition to these formal complaints, numerous concerns were raised by creditors and debtors during the debt agreement process. These matters were handled by ITSA’s Debt Agreement Service (DAS) and generally do not escalate into a formal complaint. In 2008–09, DAS resolved 5,085 such minor issues.

In 2008–09, 21 complaints (19%) were found to be justified. This is counter to the downward trend of justified complaints from previous years with 2007–08 (11%), 2006–07 (13%), 2005–06 (9%), 2004–05 (14%), 2003–04 (15%), and 2002–03 (26%) and appears to be due to a change in the type of complaints reaching BR. More serious complaints are reaching BR for investigation while minor or administrative issues are being resolved by DAS personnel and are not escalating to formal complaints. Previously, these minor complaints would also have been examined by BR increasing the number of overall complaints examined and potentially lowering the percentage of justified complaints.

Most justified complaints centred around issues concerning information and communication 46%, and creditors’ claims and dividends 23%.
Registration/eligibility of trustees and administrators
Performance measure:Only suitable qualified people are registered as bankruptcy trustees and debt agreement administrators
Bankruptcy Regulation Branch licenses registered trustees and registered debt agreement administrators on behalf of the Inspector-General. This requires the establishment of committees to interview new applicants and to consider whether a trustee should have their licence removed or conditions imposed on their continued practise. For trustees, the committees comprise the Inspector-General or her delegate, a representative from the Insolvency Practitioners Association and a member of the Australian Public Service – usually a senior employee from ITSA, the Attorney-General’s Department or another Commonwealth Agency. For debt agreement administrators, interviews are conducted by a delegate of the Inspector-General in Bankruptcy.

In 2008–09, 12 new applications were received from people wanting to be registered as bankruptcy trustees, compared to seven in 2007–08. All applications were finalised and 11 were approved.

The branch commenced disciplinary proceedings against one trustee for failing to exercise his powers or carry out his duties properly, requiring the trustee to show cause why he should not have his registration cancelled. Several other matters are currently under investigation and these are likely to result in the commencement of disciplinary proceedings.

Seventeen applications were received from people and companies seeking registration as debt agreement administrators. Sixteen applications were accepted and one was rejected.
Disciplinary action was commenced against two related-party debt agreement administrators for breaches of duty.
Inspector-General cancels administrator registration
Disciplinary action was commenced against a registered debt agreement administrator and an associated company operating as an administrator prior to 1 July 2007 (not required to be registered). Systemic errors were uncovered surrounding bank reconciliation processes as well as other unrelated issues. The registered debt agreement administrator was deregistered and the associated administrator declared ineligible to practice. In accordance with the Bankruptcy Act, the ongoing administration of these files passed to the Official Trustee.

The activities that culminated in this de-registration serve to enhance ITSA’s reputation for being a regulatory agency that takes appropriate steps where the integrity of the personal insolvency industry is put at risk.

Performance measure: People who do not meet specific criteria are prohibited from being solicitor controlling trustees and debt agreement administrators
While legal practitioners may also act as a controlling trustee in the setting up of a personal insolvency agreement under Part X of the Act, no person was declared ineligible to act as a solicitor controlling trustee during the year.
Administrative review of trustee decisions
Performance measure:Statutory reviews completed within set timeframes
ITSA’s Bankruptcy Regulation Branch, on behalf of the Inspector-General, reviews trustee decisions in relation to income contribution assessments on bankrupts, hardship applications, objections to discharge, and decisions to use supervised accounts to collect contribution assessments.

During 2008–09, there were 19 applications made to the AAT for a review of the Inspector-General’s review decisions, compared with 13 in 2007–08. Five applications for review related to income and contribution liabilities, three related to hardship and 11 related to reviews of objections to discharge. In presentations to trustees during the year the branch has emphasised that objections should be used only in the circumstances set out in the Act and in particular only when there is no other way to induce the bankrupt to discharge a duty.

Sixteen matters were finalised (comprising new matters and matters outstanding at the commencement of the period) with 15 of these being withdrawn or the Inspector-General’s review decision being confirmed by the tribunal. In the remaining matter the tribunal overturned the Inspector-General’s review decision.
TABLE 9: Inspector-General review decisions
2007–08
2008–09
Number of Inspector-General Review decisions finalised
88
77
Number of Inspector-General Review requests withdrawn by bankrupts following negotiation with the trustees
26
22
Number of Inspector-General Review decisions completed within 60-day timeframe
86
77
Percentage of review decisions completed within 60 days
(Standard 100% within 60 days)
98%
100%
Percentage of trustee decisions varied or overturned on review
33%
36%
Income contributions
Number of income contribution decisions reviewed
26
33
Number of income contributions decisions varied or overturned
14
18
Objections to discharge
Number of objection to discharge decisions reviewed
59
39
Number of objection to discharge decisions varied or overturned
15
10
General performance measure:Client satisfaction as measured by periodic client opinion surveys
Feedback from the 2009 ITSA Client Opinion Survey indicated that most professional respondents were aware of and receive the Personal Insolvency Regulator newsletter (88% of debt agreement administrators, and 95% of registered trustees). Those who received the newsletter indicated that the publishing of general rulings and practice notes in the newsletter was useful and informative. The survey also continued to show positive results about the perceived independence of the branch and its fair and reasonable treatment of professional clients.

A priority for action in the 2009 survey related to BR disciplining non-performing trustees. This perceived inaction by professional clients may be in part due to BR’s inability to publish detailed information on disciplinary action being taken. Only if a registered trustee or registered debt agreement administrator is deregistered does the information become public.

Output 1.4: Administration of bankrupt estates and other arrangements under the Bankruptcy Act
Overview
Australia’s personal insolvency system operates on the basis that a trustee or administrator is appointed in every bankruptcy or agreement under the Bankruptcy Act. When a registered trustee or administrator is not appointed or can no longer perform their function, ITSA handles the matter in its capacity as the Official Trustee.

In 2008–09, there were 27,502 new bankruptcies lodged compared to 25,970 the previous year. ITSA received 86% (23,571) of these new bankruptcies compared to 88% the previous year.

Administered estates are grouped into three broad categories:
  • those that provide a return to creditors of the estate over a longer term
  • those that provide a realisation
  • those that within three months have all preliminary investigations completed and issues settled without a realisation, being 66% of all new bankruptcies.
Strategy
The following strategy is employed by ITSA to deliver Output 1.4:
  • To notify creditors, achieve realisations, assess and collect income contributions, distribute funds in accordance with the Act and finalise estates within realistic timeframes.
Performance measure:Notify creditors of new bankruptcies and pay dividends within set timeframes and standards
After receiving a Statement of Affairs, ITSA’s standards are to send an initial notification to creditors in 90% of bankruptcies within five days and 100% within 10 days. ITSA exceeded the first notification standard and almost met the second during 2008–09.

The standard for reporting to creditors on the estate within six weeks was exceeded during 2008–09; however, the standard of reporting to all creditors within three months was not achieved, primarily because of an increase in estates with over-encumbered properties. It can take significantly longer to gather the information on properties than is available to meet the general reporting standard.

ITSA’s dividend standards are to pay dividends in 20% of administered estates and within two months of the last receipt of funds in 80% of cases. In 2008–09 both standards were exceeded but with a smaller increase over 2007–08.
TABLE 10: Key performance measures for notifying creditors and paying dividends
Performance measure
2007–08
2008–09
Initial notification of bankruptcy in five days (standard = 90%)
96%
94%
Initial notification of bankruptcy in 10 days (standard =100%)
99%
99%
Report to creditors within six weeks (standard = 75%)
87%
84%
Report to creditors within three months (standard = 100%)
94%
92%
Pay a dividend in 20% of administered cases
33%
28%
Pay 80% of dividends within two months
84%
82%
Performance measure:Approximately 6,500 estates with potentially complex issues administered annually, with property and income distributions recovered, dividends paid to creditors and possible offences identified
ITSA administered 7,670 new bankrupt estates with potentially complex affairs in 2008–09 (compared to 8,217 in 2007–08) and, where necessary, conducted investigations, recovered assets and income contributions, paid dividends and identified possible bankruptcy offences. The number of administered bankruptcies has decreased slightly due to a change in business process to more effectively identify estates when there will be no return to creditors.

The Bankruptcy Act requires a bankrupt who derives income above a threshold amount to pay contributions to their estate. The number of contributors assessed increased by 4% and the amount of contributions recovered increased by 18.1% compared to 2007-08.
TABLE 11: Level of contributors and contributions for bankruptcies handled by ITSA
2007–08
2008–09
Number of bankrupts identified as contributors
3,028
3,153
Contributions recovered
$10.9m
$12.9m

TABLE 12: Key performance measures for administered bankruptcies handled by ITSA
2007–08
2008–09
Estates on hand
7,353
7,253
Total estates finalised
7,285
7,704
% finalised estate achieved a realisation
33%
35%
% finalised estates with significant issues
44%
42%
% finalised estates paid a dividend to creditors
33%
29%
Offences referred to Bankruptcy Fraud Investigation
303
278

Estates on hand are decreasing as a result of the increase in estates able to be finalised due to improved business processes. The trend for an increase in estates that achieve a realisation should continue as improved business processes are implemented throughout ITSA. The decrease in the number of finalised estates that paid a dividend is a result of a decrease in the net realisable value of properties received in bankrupt estates.
Contributions recovered

In one Australian Capital Territory administration a bankrupt, claiming his income was below the threshold and initially assessed as a non-contributor, was investigated, found to be a contributor and re-assessed. An appeal to the Inspector-General against his re-assessment was unsuccessful. Income contributions collected together with recoveries from other property are sufficient to pay a dividend to creditors of close to 100 cents in the dollar.

Performance measure:Official Trustee administrations undertaken in accordance with the Bankruptcy Act and within agreed standards

TABLE 13: Performance against other standards for bankruptcies handled by ITSA
Performance measures
2007–08
2008–09
Finalised estates with realisations greater than $1,000
1,792
1,939
% of finalised estates with realisations greater than $1,000
(standard 70%)
60%
52%
Number of estates on hand over 42 months
762
599
Percentage of estates on hand over 42 months (standard 15%)
11%
8%
The number of estates finalised with realisations greater than $1,000 decreased by 8% over the previous period and the standard of 70% was not met. ITSA has introduced a new business process to identify estates with small issues and deal with them promptly. A period of adjustment is required to clear a build up of these estates. The new process has been successful in decreasing the level of estates on hand.

TABLE 14: Levels of outputs achieved in administered estates handled by ITSA
2006–07
2007–08
2008–09
Bankrupt estates – dividend number
1,408
1,915
2,158
– dividend amount
$16.9m
$17.3m
$17.9m
Debt agreements – distribution number
734
122
269
– distribution amount
$1.7m
$0.25m
$0.59m
Official Trustee fees
$9.5m
$11.1m
$12.15m
Objections to automatic discharge
518
1,272
589
The number of bankruptcy dividends paid to creditors increased by 13% in an effort to distribute monies in a timely manner and improve service to creditors. The amount of dividends was marginally less than 2007–08. House properties traditionally were a significant source of realisations. In new estates more recently received, a high percentage of house properties are over-encumbered. Income contributions are now increasing as a source of realisations in estates. Fees paid to the Official Trustee increased by 6% and are a factor of the amount of realisations achieved.

Last year there was a focus on using objections to discharge (which increases the bankruptcy period from three to five or eight years) as a means of gaining compliance in respect of the obligation of bankrupts to supply information and make income contributions. They have proved successful and fewer needed to be issued this year.
Investigations undertaken and objection lodged

Enquiries into the affairs of a second-time bankrupt were undertaken after she had disclosed three relatively expensive motor vehicles under security. Investigations uncovered a property sold two months prior to bankruptcy and, after making enquiries with all major financial institutions, funds from the sale were identified in a bank account conducted jointly with the bankrupt’s daughter.

The bank that held the funds at first refused to disclose information as it considered the daughter to be the primary beneficiary of the account. Using the powers under the Bankruptcy Act, the Official Trustee issued a notice to the bank, obtained the necessary information, and recovered the bankrupt’s interest in the funds.

The bankrupt’s failure to make a true and proper disclosure of her affairs was referred to Bankruptcy Fraud Investigation, who issued a warning to the bankrupt, and the trustee lodged an objection to discharge, which effectively extended her bankruptcy to eight years.

Performance measure:Low incidence of major issues raised by Bankruptcy Regulation in respect of Official Trustee administrations
Bankruptcy Regulation Branch took the decision to defer Official Trustee inspections until 2009–10 in order to focus resources on major enforcement and disciplinary projects. However, complaints against the Official Trustee were still investigated.

In the course of administering the 23,571 new bankruptcies in 2008–09 (and 7,353 estates on hand from 2007–08), 44 complaints were received about Official Trustee administrations compared to 34 complaints received in 2007–08. Of these complaints, 16 were non-investigative complaints and 28 were investigated by Bankruptcy Regulation with six complaints found to be justified.
Bankruptcy Regulation conducted 25 Inspector-General reviews compared to 28 reviews in 2007–08. Of the Official Trustee decisions reviewed, 16 related to income assessments in regard to income contributions. Six assessments were varied and five withdrawn as a result of the review. Nine related to objections to discharge lodged to induce bankrupts to provide evidence of their income and generally to comply with their obligations to make contributions to their bankrupt estate. Six of the objections were confirmed and two were withdrawn; the balance of the reviews are awaiting an outcome.
General performance measure:Client satisfaction as measured by periodic client opinion surveys
Feedback from the 2009 client opinion survey on the service provided by the Official Trustee shows an overall increase in bankrupt clients’ satisfaction levels compared to the 2005 survey results. The main area where clients seek improvement is to be kept informed of developments during bankruptcy. ITSA is reviewing the way it communicates with clients to find a more cost effective and efficient way of meeting their needs.

While fewer creditors indicated they were satisfied with ITSA’s estate administration services (84% compared with 93% in 2005), ITSA was rated consistently better than other private registered trustees across ten dimensions contained in the survey, this was also consistent with the findings of the 2005 survey.

One development has been the increasing trend to use the ITSA internet website for downloading information and documents and more bankrupts reported they found the information relevant and useful.

Output 1.5: Investigation of Bankruptcy Act offences
Overview
ITSA is responsible for upholding public confidence in the personal insolvency system. In doing so, ITSA receives, assesses and investigates alleged offence referrals and prepares briefs of evidence for possible prosecution by the Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions (CDPP). ITSA is also responsible for investigating bankruptcy-related offences under the Commonwealth Crimes Act 1914, various state crime statutes and the Commonwealth Criminal Code 1995.
Referrals of alleged offences are received from the Official Trustee, registered trustees in private practice, registered debt agreement administrators, creditors and the general public.

During 2008–09, ITSA’s Bankruptcy Fraud Investigation Unit (BFI) received and assessed 988 alleged offence referrals; commenced 730 investigations; completed 851 investigations; achieved voluntary compliance in 259 matters.3; and forwarded 306 briefs of evidence to the CDPP.

Over the year, 239 offenders were found guilty of criminal offences: 203 offenders were convicted in relation to 311 bankruptcy-related charges and eight people received custodial sentences. A further 36 offenders received non-conviction bonds or fines for an additional 39 offences.

3 Compliance achieved refers to matters where an investigation was conducted and the alleged offender voluntarily complied, thereby avoiding the need for prosecution.
Note – excludes matters where compliance was achieved subsequent to a prosecution
Strategies
The following strategies are employed to meet Output 1.5:
  • identify and investigate material offences under the Bankruptcy Act
  • prepare briefs of evidence for prosecution by the CDPP
  • refer allegations of serious and/or complex fraud to state and federal police services in accordance with the Commonwealth Fraud Control Guidelines
  • provide advice and assistance to ITSA clients and stakeholders regarding Bankruptcy Act offences.
Performance measure: Timely identification and investigation of material offences under the Bankruptcy Act
ITSA has qualified fraud investigation staff who undertake complex bankruptcy offence investigations and who work closely with the Australian Federal Police, state police services and other government agencies to deliver a whole-of-government approach to its bankruptcy-related investigations. This enables search warrants, warrants of apprehension and other actions requiring a police presence or a multi-jurisdictional approach to be effected in an expedient and professional manner.

TABLE 15: Referral and investigation statistics
2007–08
2008–09
Trend
Offence referrals received
1,144
988
14%
Referrals accepted
868
722
17%
Investigations commenced
842
730
13%
Investigations completed
784
851
9%
Value of fraud assessed ($m)
25.07
27.11
8%
Of the 988 referrals received during the year, 97% of referrals were assessed and determined for investigation within 14 days of receipt (against a standard of 100%) and 73% were accepted for investigation.

During 2008–09, 239 people were found guilty of 350 charges, which had an estimated fraud value in excess of $2.4m.

Significant prosecutions for 2008–09

On 14 July 2008, four-time bankrupt John Navarolli of Balmoral (Qld) was sentenced in the Brisbane Magistrates’ Court for a range of fraud-related offences. The offences included making a false statement, forgery, dishonestly obtaining property and obtaining $55,000 credit without disclosing his bankruptcy status. Navarolli was sentenced to two years imprisonment with a 12-month non-parole period.

On 21 November 2008, William Frederick Pearce of Zillmere (Qld) was convicted of obtaining in excess of $35,000 without disclosing his bankruptcy status. Pearce, a five-time bankrupt, was sentenced to two years imprisonment in the Brisbane District Court.

On 28 August 2008, two-time bankrupt Peter Koumaros of Brighton (Vic) was convicted in the Melbourne Magistrates’ Court of six counts of obtaining a total of $153,000 credit by fraud and three counts of incurring a debt without having any reasonable prospects of repayment. Koumaros was sentenced to six months imprisonment, which was to be served by way of an Intensive Corrections Order.

On 2 December 2008, Constantinos Gounas of Findon (SA) was sentenced to 22 months imprisonment for numerous bankruptcy offences. The offences included making a false declaration and several counts of obtaining goods and services, which totalled $55,000, without disclosing his bankruptcy status. Gounas was sentenced to an aggregate term of 22 months imprisonment and was ordered to serve nine months before being released upon entering into a recognisance.

On 3 April 2009, John Peter Van Tilburg of Eagle Farm (Qld) was convicted in the Brisbane Magistrates’ Court of of bankruptcy-related offences involving funds totalling $55,000. Offences related to carrying on a business and issuing a cheque, and obtaining money for goods and services without disclosing his bankruptcy status. Van Tilburg was sentenced to nine months imprisonment and released upon entering into recognisance.

On 28 November 2008, Shannon Troy Condon of Nightcliff (NT) was convicted in the Darwin Court of Summary Jurisdiction of two counts of obtaining credit totalling $239,000 without disclosing his bankruptcy status contrary to the Bankruptcy Act. Condon was sentenced to two months imprisonment and released forthwith upon entering into a recognisance.

On 24 July 2008, Alan Arnold Rogers of Crestmead (Qld) was convicted in the Brisbane Magistrates’ Court of obtaining goods and services, and credit in excess of $78,000 without disclosing his bankruptcy status. Rogers, a three-time bankrupt, was sentenced to 12 months imprisonment and immediately released upon entering into a recognisance.

On 10 July 2008, Jacob Kienan of Caulfield (Vic) was convicted in the Melbourne Magistrates’ Court of disposing of property after bankruptcy with the intent to defeat creditors. Kienan was sentenced to five months imprisonment and immediately released upon entering into an 18-month recognisance.

In addition to prosecution action, warning letters are issued to alleged offenders considered to have committed minor infringements of the offence provisions of the Act, such as first-time offenders who might have incurred a small amount of credit without informing the credit provider that they were an undischarged bankrupt at the time.

In all instances where a warning letter is issued, ITSA investigators conduct follow-up interviews with the alleged offenders, educating them about their rights and responsibilities, and counselling them about the potential consequences of any future non-compliance. When a recipient of a warning letter elects not to participate in the interview process, BFI withdraws the warning letter and prosecution actions are initiated.
In 2008–09 ITSA issued warning letters to 156 first-time alleged offenders regarding less serious breaches of the Bankruptcy Act.
The effectiveness of these warning letters and subsequent educative interviews is illustrated by the fact that in the six years BFI has been issuing warning letters, only one recipient of this strategy has re-offended and that person was prosecuted immediately.
Performance measure:Increased number of briefs to the Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions leading to successful prosecutions
In 2008–09, 306 briefs of evidence were submitted to the CDPP for prosecution of which 92% were accepted for prosecution. This is a 14% increase in the number of briefs submitted in 2007–08. The streamlining of referral procedures and brief of evidence formats has enabled ITSA to maintain a high level of prosecution action by allowing a greater number of briefs of evidence to be actioned by our CDPP partners.

In addition to the 251 matters prosecuted in 2008–09, at 30 June 2009 there were 223 ITSA briefs of evidence with the CDPP awaiting prosecution.

Performance measure: Enforcement strategies ensure compliance with the Bankruptcy Act
Of the 528 referrals received by BFI in 2008–09 relating to bankrupts who had not filed their Statement of Affairs form, 86% were accepted for investigation. Of these, 153 matters were resolved by way of voluntary compliance while 158 matters had prosecution action initiated due to the bankrupt’s continuing non-compliance. The remainder of referrals continue to be investigated.

ITSA’s commitment to achieving increased levels of voluntary compliance in lieu of prosecution action continues to be enhanced through its on-going partnership with the Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology University (RMITU) – a partnership that sees students who are undertaking a Bachelor of Arts (Criminal Justice Administration) complete a three-month placement within the BFI Compliance Team. Students progressing through ITSA’s Compliance Team are instructed in the basics of law enforcement and gain skills in an on-the-job law enforcement environment.

This collaborative relationship allows ITSA to pursue ongoing compliance strategies while simultaneously assisting the RMITU in achieving its undergraduate teaching and development aims.
ITSA targets non-compliance
In 2008–09, BFI received 714 allegations pertaining to individuals, whether bankrupt or not, who had failed to provide a trustee or the Official Receiver with specific information or documents. Two hundred and sixty two briefs of evidence were submitted to the CDPP, 259 individuals voluntarily complied with their obligations and 53 matters remain under investigation. A further 106 matters were ceased because the individuals voluntarily complied immediately prior to the court date, were unable to be located, or absconded prior to prosecution action commencing.
Performance measure: Client satisfaction as measured by periodic client opinion surveys
Although not identified as a major area for improvement, stakeholder feedback from the 2009 client survey has identified an ongoing request for BFI to keep registered trustees updated during the investigation process. This area of concern has been raised in previous surveys and other stakeholder feedback forums. As a consequence BFI now provides the referring party with a quarterly update on the progress of the investigation.

Output 1.6: Administration of proceeds of crime property
Overview
ITSA, in its capacity as Official Trustee, administers property in accordance with orders made under the Proceeds of Crime Act 1987, the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 and the Customs Act 1901. ITSA takes custody of restrained property and disposes of restrained and forfeited property, and pays proceeds into the Confiscated Assets Account (CAA) and the Confiscated Assets Special Account (CASA).

ITSA works with the Australian Federal Police (AFP), the Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions (CDPP) and other law enforcement agencies when performing its ‘proceeds of crime’ role.

Total recoveries amounting to $16.95m were paid into the CAA and CASA with a total balance of $21.49m of which $20.31m is available for distribution. ITSA distributed $12.21m to law enforcement and drug rehabilitation programs in accordance with determinations made by the Minister ($6.68m in 2007–08) and distributed $0.68m under the equitable-sharing program.

Of the 141 matters on hand, 137 relate to matters under the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 and four relate to the Proceeds of Crime Act 1987.

TABLE 16: Proceeds of crime summary
2007–08
2008–09
Custody & control orders
24
12
Pecuniary penalty & forfeiture orders
75
125
Value of property taken under control during the year
$24.13m
$25.88m
Total value of property on hand under control at 30 June
$56.45m
$41.18m
Amount paid out of CAA and CASA
$13.99m
$16.95m

Strategies

The following strategy is employed to deliver Output 1.6:

  • Using ITSA’s trustee expertise, locate, control and, if necessary, sell property under proceeds of crime legislation.
Performance measure: Achieve control of property as soon as that property is identified
When action is taken against people who have been charged with, convicted of, or are suspected of, having committed Commonwealth offences, orders may be made for the Official Trustee to take control of property to preserve its value, pending the making of pecuniary penalty orders, forfeiture or other orders.

There has been a significant decrease in the value of property taken under control of the Official Trustee as a result of a 50% decrease in the number of custody and control orders obtained by CDPP.
ITSA met the standards of taking action to control property within 24 hours of notification and achieving control within two weeks of locating property except where property is retained by law enforcement agencies for evidentiary or operational purposes.

Control and management of property

In April 2009, as part of a joint AFP/Queensland Police operation, ITSA assisted in the seizure of property including four motor vehicles, two Harley Davidson motorbikes, a jet ski, bank accounts totalling $815,000 and cash of $994,900.

In May 2009 the Queensland District Court made custody and control orders in relation to the seized property, as well as the defendant’s substantially completed residential house property and two partially completed houses he was building on the Sunshine Coast. ITSA has engaged a project consultant to monitor the completion of the coastal properties to be paid for out of seized funds.

Performance measure: All forfeited property realised within timeframes and standards

The court may impose a pecuniary penalty order on people who have committed, or who have been convicted of, Commonwealth offences and/or may order forfeiture of restrained property. Where the conviction involves a serious offence, restrained property is automatically forfeited. The Official Trustee must then sell or otherwise dispose of the property to satisfy the penalty or deal with the forfeited property.

There has been a 65% increase in the number of pecuniary penalties and forfeitures received during 2008–09; however this has largely contributed to an increase in orders requiring the destruction of property with little or no value.

The standard of disposing of property within six months of receipt of final orders was met in 2008–09, except where property was held by the AFP for evidentiary or operational purposes, and in three instances where real property was unable to be sold for reasons outside the Official Trustee’s control.

Foreign forfeiture order

In August 1999 a foreign restraining order was obtained in the USA in respect of serious offences of visa fraud, money laundering and immigration offences. The order was registered in the Supreme Court of Victoria under the Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters Act 1987 and ITSA was directed to take custody and control of property including a motor vehicle, marine vessel, shares and two real properties.

A final order of forfeiture was obtained in the USA in January 2008 and registered in the Supreme Court in October 2008. An application for compensation was filed in the Supreme Court and subsequently withdrawn, allowing ITSA to commence realising the property, currently valued at about $472,000.

TABLE 17: Monies recovered under the relevant Acts and payments into the associated accounts
Payment into Confiscated Assets Special Account (Proceeds of Crime Act 1987)
Payment into Confiscated Assets Account

(Proceeds of Crime Act 2002)

2007–08
2008–09
2007–08
2008–09
Forfeiture orders & pecuniary penalty orders (ss.19, 26 & 30 of the Proceeds of Crime Act 1987)
$1.08m
$0.24m
Nil
Nil
Forfeiture orders & pecuniary penalty orders (ss.47, 48, 49, 92, 116 & 134 of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002)
Nil
Nil
$19.01m
$16.70m
Customs Act 1901 (ss.24E & 208DA)
Nil
Nil
Nil
$0.01m
Payments received under the Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters Act 1987
$1.78m
Nil
Nil
Nil
Program refunds (s.298 of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002)
Nil
Nil
$0.19m
$0.09m
Interest earned
$0.12m
$0.02m
$0.57m
$0.85m
Total
$2.98m
$0.26m
$19.77m
$17.65m

Confiscated Assets Special Account
Proceeds from property realised under the Proceeds of Crime Act 1987 are paid into the CASA along with interest earned. Since the introduction of the 2002 Act in January 2003, no new matters have been initiated under the 1987 Act.
The balance of funds of $272,741 has, as a consequence, been transferred to consolidated revenue.

Confiscated Assets Account
From 1 January 2003, proceeds from property realised under the Customs Act 1901 and the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 have been paid into the CAA along with interest earned. During the year $0.28m was paid to the United Kingdom and $0.20m each to the governments of Victoria and New South Wales under equitable sharing arrangements.

As at 30 June 2009, ITSA held an amount of $21.49m, of which $1.18m was committed to programs, as approved by the Minister, for crime prevention or law enforcement measures, and measures relating to treatment of drug addiction; and $20.31m was available for other distribution.

3. Management and Accountability
Corporate governance
ITSA’s corporate governance arrangements comprise the structures and procedures by which the agency is directed and controlled, and the mechanisms by which those who direct and control the agency are supervised.

The Minister and Parliament
ITSA’s Chief Executive reports to the Attorney-General and, in accordance with the Public Service Act 1999 and the Financial Management and Accountability Act 1997 (FMA Act), assists the Attorney-General to fulfil his accountability obligations to the Parliament. In this annual report the Chief Executive accounts for ITSA’s performance and use of resources.

In a separate report, as required under the Bankruptcy Act, the Inspector-General reports annually to the Attorney-General, for presentation to the Parliament, on the operation of the Bankruptcy Act.

ITSA’s accountability to the Parliament also includes scrutiny through relevant Parliamentary committees including Senate Estimates hearings.Direction and control
Senior executives
The Chief Executive is responsible for managing and leading ITSA in accordance with the Public Service Act 1999, the FMA Act 1997 and other legislation. As the Inspector-General in Bankruptcy, the Chief Executive is also responsible for the general administration of the Bankruptcy Act.

The National Manager of Bankruptcy Regulation and the five Official Receivers who managed the state and territory branches were responsible for the delivery of ITSA’s regulatory and operational services respectively (see organisation chart on p 12).

The Executive Director was responsible for the Secretariat Branch, located primarily in Canberra, which gave legal, financial, personnel, IT and administrative support to ITSA. Until 30 June 2009 ITSA’s Bankruptcy Fraud Investigation section was attached to the Secretariat Branch.

ITSA’s Leadership Team comprised all senior executives listed below as well as the leaders of ITSA’s Legal, Information and Communication Technology (ICT), Finance, Fraud Investigation and Human Resource functions.TABLE 18: ITSA senior executives 2008–09
Chief ExecutiveVeronique Ingram (also Inspector-General in Bankruptcy)
David Bergman (acting Chief Executive 1 July 2008 – 30 January 2009
Executive DirectorPeter Lowe
National Manager, Bankruptcy RegulationAndrew Robinson
Jeff Hanley (acting National Manager November 2008 – present)
Official ReceiversGiulia Inga – New South Wales & Australian Capital Territory
Digby Ross – Queensland
Adam Toma – Victoria and Tasmania
Jerry White (acting) – Western Australia
Pat Tragauer – South Australia & Northern Territory
During the year, options for developing stronger and more consistant national management for all functions were considered. One of the principle aims was to ensure ITSA continued to maintain high levels of service delivery to all clients, wherever they are.

Options to achieve this objective were the subject of extensive consultation with all employees. Other objectives were to ensure ITSA’s structure maximised the effective use of resources, an enabled ITSA to be in the best position to harness the benefits of improved service delivery optioins, including online services.

Ultimately it was decided to adopt a structure based on five national business lines.FIGURE 2: ITSA’s five new business lines and national managers (commencing 1 July 2009)
Chart displaying FIGURE 2: ITSA’s five new business lines and national managers (commencing 1 July 2009)
The new National Management Board consists of the Chief Executive and the national managers in the chart above. The National Management Board assists the Chief Executive in managing the agency and discharging the responsibilities of the Inspector-General, Official Receiver and the Official Trustee. The Board sets ITSA’s strategic direction, determines appropriate policies and monitors performance.

The Board meets monthly and notes of key matters discussed are circulated to all employees after meetings and posted on the ITSA intranet. Papers considered at meetings are also available on the intranet.
Audit and Financial Practices Committee
ITSA’s Audit and Financial Practices Committee advises the Chief Executive and ITSA management on a range of audit and financial practice matters. In addition to considering the results of the various internal and external audits and, importantly, the action subsequently taken to respond to and implement auditors’ recommendations, the committee also monitors the application of and compliance with systems and frameworks for ensuring high levels of internal controls, financial reporting, risk management and fraud control.

The Audit and Financial Practices Committee has three members: an independent (external) Chairman, Peter Kennedy, PSM and two ITSA senior executives –
Digby Ross FCA, FCPA (the Branch Head and Official Receiver, Queensland), and Pat Tragauer (Branch Head and Official Receiver, South Australia appointed to replace David Bergman). Committee meetings ordinarily are attended by ITSA’s internal auditors, KPMG, Australian National Audit Office representatives who attend as observers, and ITSA’s Executive Director, the Chief Finance Officer and the Finance Manager. One committee member was unable to attend one of the four meetings during the financial year.

Internal audits completed during 2008–09 tested both compliance and performance when addressing a range of functions, including data integrity of the National Personal Insolvency Index, Proceeds of Crime asset administration, Debt Agreement System regulation and compliance, management and use of government corporate credit cards, the annual payroll review and a review and update of ITSA’s Chief Executive Instructions.

Employee consultative committees
The National Consultative Committee (NCC) and Branch Consultative Committees (BCC) facilitate consultation with employees on administration and workplace issues, including operational policy and practice changes, organisational change, accommodation and improvement strategies. The NCC and BCC met regularly during 2008–09 to discuss important issues such as the proposed new certified agreement and the proposed restructure.

Corporate and operational plans
ITSA maintains an integrated planning process, which is initiated at the annual planning workshop early in each calendar year. There are linkages between ITSA’s Strategic Plan, the annual Business Plan and individual employee performance plans. National priorities and objectives and performance measures cascade down to branch plans and, ultimately, to individual employee performance and development plans. This assists employees’ understanding of the expectations for their role and how their role contributes to the achievement of ITSA’s overall national strategies.
Business improvement initiatives
ITSA continued the development and implementation of the eSolve case management initiative. The eSolve system both enables the delivery of quality services and provides a robust and efficient electronic business platform for employees. This year further phases of the program were implemented to enhance effective and efficient outcomes to ITSA and its clients and stakeholders, specifically through:
  • expansion of the range of business transactions covered by the eSolve solution, thereby improving services to clients, improving data quality and extending the information held in electronic case files for benefit across business lines
  • the introduction of the eSolve solution to the complex estate administration area, introducing improved facilities for the capture and usage of assets and liabilities information to enhance case administration and provide for more robust financial governance and reporting
  • further automation of the manner in which information is received and processed into ITSA’s systems.

In addition ICT undertook a major initiative to support the restructure along business lines.
Values, conduct and ethical standards
ITSA’s Business Plan and Collective Agreement play a lead role in reinforcing the requirement for ITSA employees to uphold the Australian Public Service (APS) Values and comply with the Code of Conduct. The Values and the Code also are incorporated into ITSA’s generic capability framework, which is used as the basis for selecting employees. Information on the Values and Code of Conduct is contained in induction material given to each new employee, and is posted on ITSA’s intranet. Formal procedures are in place for investigating and determining breaches of the Code of Conduct and for handling reports from whistleblowers. One complaint was received in 2008–09 and an independent investigation is currently underway.

The Values, implications of breaches of the Code, and the importance of handling confidential information sensitively and appropriately were some of the themes covered in all staff information sessions held in all offices in March 2009. Information on the APS Commission’s ethics advisory service was circulated to all employees in May 2009, and links were made from the ITSA website to the APS Commission ethics page.

Managing risk and fraud
Risk management is an integral part of ITSA’s planning and management processes at all levels. ITSA’s Risk Management Plan sets out a systematic process and tools to help identify, analyse, assess, manage and monitor risks to ITSA in achieving its objectives.

During 2008–09, each of ITSA’s business lines had detailed management assurance programs with monthly management reports to address or minimise risks within their areas of business. Separately, senior managers, with assistance from the internal auditors, re-assessed higher-level risk from the agency-wide perspective, further complementing risk assessments at the business line level.

ITSA’s Fraud Control Plan, in accordance with the Commonwealth Fraud Control Guidelines, is based on a comprehensive risk assessment which assesses both inherent fraud risk and associated mitigation strategies. During 2008–09, ITSA’s Fraud Control Plan was extensively reviewed and updated to take into account management assurance practice, the new restructure and associated roles and IT specific fraud references. Separately, annual fraud data has been collected and reported in accordance with fraud control guidelines.

Senior executive remuneration
ITSA employees work under a Collective Agreement that includes provisions for organisational improvement linked to pay outcomes. The nature and amount of remuneration for senior executive service officers during 2008–09 was determined by Australian Workplace Agreements (AWAs). There were five SES employed under AWAs in ITSA for this period.

Note 11 to our financial statements gives the number of executives whose total remuneration falls within each $15,000 band commencing at $130,000 and the aggregate remuneration paid to all executives.

Client service
Client Service Charter
ITSA’s performance is measured against service standards set out in the Client Service Charter. The charter is available as a hard-copy booklet, a short-form brochure and is also accessible on the ITSA website.

In 2008–09, over 22,000 copies of the charter booklet were distributed. Charters were sent or given to:
  • every person for whom ITSA was administering a bankruptcy or debt agreement
  • clients such as financial counsellors, creditors and registered trustees
  • attendees at ITSA-run education and information sessions.

Charter brochures (short version) were also distributed to debtors making initial enquiries about bankruptcy and its alternatives and during presentations and information sessions.

Service standards
Service standards for returning telephone calls promptly, sending documents when requested and answering letters are measured by exception.

Nearly all of the service charter standards are used as performance measures and are reported under relevant outputs elsewhere in this report.

For example:
  • ninety-four per cent of initial reports to creditors were sent within five days of receipt of each bankrupt’s Statement of Affairs. This is broadly consistent with last year’s performance (96%) and remains in excess of the service standard of 90%
  • the number of dividends paid to creditors within two months of the last receipt of funds was 82% in 2008–09 (84% in 2007–08) against a standard of 80%.

Complaints
During 2007–08, ITSA rolled out a new Complaints and Compliments reporting system to all branches. The system, which included revised complaints handling protocols and training, was developed to provide a centralised database for recording client feedback, to facilitate the monitoring and analysis of client feedback, and to further enhance ITSA’s reporting functions. The reporting of complaints by ITSA during 2008–09 has increased dramatically as a direct result of this system.
General complaints
In 2008–09, 409 general complaints (62 in 2007–08) were recorded about service delivery standards, as distinct from complaints about the way in which debtors became bankrupt, which is outside ITSA’s control. Of these, 217 were considered justified (17 in 2007–08), with over 77% of all complaints received during the year being justified or partially justified.

The majority of complaints received related to accuracy of information and data entry issues as well as responsiveness. Where a complaint was found to be justified, remedial action was undertaken, for example, to fully deliver the service initially requested, make corrections to personal details or provide more substantial information.

ITSA has identified the time taken to deal with complaints as an area for improvement in 2009–10. During 2008–09, 55% of complaints were resolved within 14 days (our acknowledged timeframe for addressing complaints). Over 18% of complaints took in excess of 150 days to finalise; however, much of this delay is attributable to poor recording practices in the complaints system as opposed to actual delays in resolving the complaint.

At 30 June 2009, nine complaints remained outstanding.

Ministerial correspondence
There were 140 letters directed through the Minister’s office or direct to the Inspector-General during 2008–09 that contained enquiries or complaints. Of those complaints which lend themselves to remedial action by ITSA, four were considered justified and one was considered partially justified. It should be noted that many of these complaints had already been examined through either ITSA’s internal review process or by Bankruptcy Regulation, and occasionally by the Ombudsman.

Ombudsman
The Commonwealth Ombudsman’s office advised that it received 71 complaints in connection with ITSA during 2008–09. This is a 21% increase on the 56 complaints received in the previous year but is largely attributable to a high volume of approaches (10) received on one matter, none of which were investigated by the Ombudsman’s office.

During 2008–09, the Ombudsman investigated eight cases (11%), five of which had been concluded by 30 June 2009. The matters investigated involved a range of issues but the most common theme related to concerns that ITSA had failed to adequately clarify or explain information about an individual’s bankruptcy.

One Ombudsman investigation resulted in a finding of ‘administrative deficiency’. The finding was the result of the Official Trustee requiring a bankrupt to apply under the Bankruptcy Act 1966 using a specific standard form. The Act however only prescribes that the relevant application be ‘in writing’. ITSA accepted the Ombudsman finding and has since given appropriate instructions to officers to ensure that its practice is consistent and accords with legislative requirements.
Compliments
During 2008–09, 215 compliments about the quality of service provided by ITSA employees were recorded. Compliments mainly related to the courteous and friendly service offered by ITSA staff.

For example:
    ‘Every time I call I always receive professional information’

    ‘ITSA staff are the most positive government department I have ever had to deal with’

    ‘My case officer was very professional and caring, she answered my enquiries very well and it was the first time in a long while that someone had treated me as a person without passing judgment in regards to my situation. I have had so many issues with the way some customer service officers have treated me previously from different organisations and when I spoke to ITSA I was very surprised at how nice and professional she was in dealing with me’

Client service
During 2008–09, ITSA initiated various new strategies that were planned to produce improved levels of client service and simplified procedures for clients dealing with ITSA.

These included:
  • the development and publication of the Personal Insolvency Information for Debtors booklet which provides ITSA’s clients with a reference resource for key insolvency information
  • a review of key insolvency statistics for publication on the ITSA website
  • streamlining the printing and mailout of debtor packs
  • improving ITSA’s on-line forms
  • providing a more client-centric ITSA public website by providing a clear entry point for each of ITSA’s major client types
  • development of an A to Z index of all Personal Insolvency Regulator (PIR) articles and Inspector-General Practice Directions and Practice Statements for website.
  • preparing for the July 2009 launch of ITSA’s initial deployment of online services to assist insolvency practitioners
  • continued roll-out of eSolve which is continually improving efficiencies
  • launching a Practices and Policy page on the website which provides both practice guidance for practitioners and transparency on how ITSA makes decisions.

Social justice and equity
People who find themselves in financial difficulty come from a wide range of cultural and socio-economic backgrounds. ITSA provides information about bankruptcy, debt agreements and other options directly to those in financial difficulties or affected by other people’s financial failure. ITSA is aware of how insolvency affects people within our community, and aims to ensure that access to useful information and services is readily available to enable debtors and others to help themselves.

In line with social justice principles, ITSA ensures information and services are accessible through a range of channels including a 1300 telephone enquiry service, counter service, publications and an extensive website.

The following Access and Equity initiatives were taken during 2008–09 to improve ITSA’s ability to meet client needs:
  • the redesign of ITSA’s prescribed forms which include the prescribed information that under the Bankruptcy Act, must be available to debtors before they commit themselves to becoming bankrupt
  • the development of ITSA’s Personal Insolvency Information for Debtors publication which will enhance access to key insolvency information
  • the introduction of ITSA’s Complaints and Compliments reporting system improved the to recording and analysis of client feedback of our services and service standards. A new fact sheet was also developed to communicate details of the new Complaints and Compliments system to clients
  • the conduct of ITSA’s biennial client opinion survey which provides clients with an opportunity to comment on ITSA’s products and services and consider how services may be improved
  • the extensive web release of policies and practices outlining how ITSA makes decisions.

ITSA’s Information Service continues to record all client contacts with ITSA. Part of this record involves logging clients’ special needs, eg, if clients have a language preference or disability which requires special attention. The Information Service maintains accurate records of Translating and Interpreting Service (TIS) usage and the types of languages that are being translated for clients. All of this information will enable us to better understand our client groups and will assist in identifying a target audience for new information/publications.

Planned work in this area during 2009–10 includes:
  • development of translated and audio versions of the Personal Insolvency Information for Debtors publication
  • incorporation of learnings and recommendations from ITSA’s biennial client opinion survey and complaints and compliments database into business planning.

External scrutiny
Review of ITSA’s administration is also available under the Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977 and the Ombudsman Act 1976.

There were no judicial decisions, or decisions of administrative tribunals that have had, or may have, a significant impact on the operations of ITSA, nor has ITSA been the subject of any reports on its operations by any parliamentary committees or the Commonwealth Ombudsman during the year.

Section 313 of the Bankruptcy Act 1966 requires the Auditor-General to inspect and audit the accounts and records of the Official Trustee and the Official Receivers and to report to the Minister at least once in each financial year. The Auditor-General advised that the audit of the accounts and records of the Official Trustee and the Official Receivers undertaken during the 2008–09 financial year for the period 1 March 2008 to 29 February 2009 was completed with satisfactory results.

In the Auditor-General’s opinion, proper accounts and records were maintained by the Official Trustee and the Official Receivers, and receipt, expenditure and investment of moneys by the Official Trustee and the Official Receivers were in accordance with the provisions of the Act and the Bankruptcy Rules.

Financial management
Overview of financial performance
The financial statements for the year ended 30 June 2009 can be found in Section 5. These financial statements have been prepared on an accrual basis in accordance with Australian Accounting Standards and the Finance Minister’s Orders. The Australian National Audit Office has issued an unqualified audit report on the financial statements.

The financial statements show that ITSA achieved an operating surplus of $0.052m, or 0.1% of the total income. As in 2007-08, this result reflects larger than expected revenue from other (non-appropriation) sources during the year, and will assist in providing an injection of resources to effect the continued development of business improvement initiatives.

Table 19: Agency Resource statement
Agency resource statement 2008–09
Actual available appropriations for 2008-09 $’000
Payments made
2008-09 $’000
Balance remaining 2008-09 $’000
ORDINARY ANNUAL SERVICES
Departmental outputs
Prior year departmental appropriations
5,568
5,568
3,214
Departmental outputs
36,317
33,103
S. 31 relevant agency receipts
1,382
1,382
Repayments to Commonwealth
1,435
1,435
Appropriations recoverable GST

(FMAA s30A)

1,761
1,761
Total
46,463
43,249
3,214
Administered expenses
Outcome 1
-
-
Total
-
-
Total ordinary annual services
46,463
43,249
OTHER SERVICES
Administered expenses
Specific payments to states, ACT, NT

and local government

Outcome 1
-
-
Total
-
-
New administered expenses
Outcome 1
-
-
Total
-
-
Departmental non-operating
Equity injections
1,643
1,248
Total
1,643
1,248
395
Administered non-operating
Administered assets and liabilities
-
-
Total
-
-
Total other services
1,643
1,248
SPECIAL APPROPRIATIONS
Special appropriations limited by criteria/entitlement
Bankruptcy Act 1966
506
Proceeds of Crime Act 1987
191
Proceeds of Crime Act 2002
7,119
Financial Management and Accountability Act 1997
1,733
Total special appropriations
9,549
SPECIAL ACCOUNTS
Opening balance
17,007
Appropriation receipts
19,697
Non-appropn receipts to special accts
1,473
Payments made
16,399
Total special accounts
38,177
16,399
21,778
Total resourcing and payments
86,283
70,445
21,778
Table 20 shows some variations between budget and actual for individual outputs, based on operational decisions made during the year.

Workload pressures in Output 3.1 due to increases in debt agreement activity from 2007–08 and increased legal activity in the defence of the Inspector-General, contributed to an increase in resources to the regulation of bankruptcy trustees and debt agreement administrators.

ITSA’s financial performance is summarised by output in the table below.

TABLE 20: Resources for outcomes and outputs
OUTCOME 1: A personal insolvency system that produces equitable outcomes for debtors and creditors, enjoys public confidence and minimises
the impact of financial failure on the community
Budget
2008-09
$000
Actual expenses
2008-09
$000
Variation
$000
Departmental outputs:
Output 1.1: Personal insolvency laws which satisfy business and community needs
567
745
(178)
Output 1.2: A bankruptcy registry service and compliance with the Bankruptcy Act
12,860
12,300
560
Output 1.3: Regulation of bankruptcy trustees and debt agreement administrators
3,089
4,585
(1,496)
Output 1.4: Administration of bankrupt estates and other arrangements under the Bankruptcy Act
17,728
16,955
773
Output 1.5: Investigation of Bankruptcy Act offences
2,511
2,834
(323)
Output 1.6: Administration of proceeds of crime property
1,283
1,688
(405)
Total expenses
38,039
39,107
(1,068)
Departmental revenue:
- Sale of goods and services to non-Governments bodies and revenue from other sources
1,722
2,842
1,120
Administered revenue (returned from Government):
- For bankruptcy and proceeds of crime activities
28,270
28,057
(213)
Total revenues
29,992
30,899
907
Net cost to budget of ITSA’s services
8,047
8,208
(161)
Cost recovery in ITSA
In carrying out its functions, ITSA imposes various fees and charges for the products and services it provides, in accordance with the Australian Government Cost Recovery Policy.

ITSA has completed five reviews of its fees and charges in accordance with that policy:
  • In February 2005 – the initial review, for consideration by government in the 2005-06 Budget;
  • In June 2006, immediately prior to the 1 July 2006 introduction in ITSA of the changed fees and charges regime, to verify that fee levels accurately reflected costs;
  • In April 2007, as a result of the Bankruptcy Legislation Amendment (Debt Agreements) Act 2007 which introduced a new registration system for debt agreement administrators;
  • In June 2007, as a result of the Bankruptcy (Estate Charges) Amendment Act 2007 which, from 1 July 2007, extended the realisations charge and interest charge to apply to moneys received in debt agreements;
  • In June 2008, as a result of the first biennial review of fees and charges following the introduction of the new regime on 1 July 2006.

The outcome of the first biennial review was a reduction in the charges to access material on ITSA’s National Personal Insolvency Index (NPII) (a decrease from $22 to $20 per extract).

A second biennial review will be undertaken in the 2009–10 financial year, to be effective from 1 July 2010.

Each review has included stakeholder consultation, and has resulted in a Cost Recovery Impact Statement (CRIS). All five CRIS’s are available on ITSA’s internet site.
Procurement
The Commonwealth Procurement Guidelines (CPGs) form the basis for ITSA’s procurement practices and procedures. The CPG principles are reflected in ITSA’s Chief Executive Instructions (CEIs) and supporting procedural rules which are available to all employees through ITSA’s intranet.

General procurement is devolved to branches, where acquisitions and expenditure are monitored to ensure value for money in delivering ITSA’s outputs. The procurement of goods and services of a materially significant or national nature is centrally coordinated. This ensures that more complex procurement is handled by appropriately trained staff.

Consultants and competitive tendering and contracting
ITSA’s contracts with private suppliers for the provision of internal audit, accommodation, and media support extended into 2008–09.

During 2008–09, tenders were held for ICT matters, the provision of transactional banking and recruitment services.

Refer to Appendix 4 for further details on consultancy services within ITSA.
Management of ITSA’s people
ITSA’s strategic people objective is:
  • all leaders in ITSA are accountable for building a team environment that drives innovation and enthusiasm with people who are focussed on achieving business outcomes.

The key focus of the ITSA’s People Strategy for 2008–09 has been continuous improvement across the agency, specifically at the team level. A regular employee opinion survey continued to be used as the guide for organisational improvement and development. In October 2008, as a result of the survey, all teams in ITSA developed team action plans in order to improve their team performance in terms of morale and well being, resulting in improved business outcomes throughout the year.Leadership
ITSA responded to the identified need to focus on leadership skills by embarking on a Leadership Development Program for all the members of the Executive Group. This five-day program was conducted over seven months, specifically targeting skills associated with team work, collaboration, giving and receiving feedback, learning and coaching. This skills-development process aimed to achieve behavioural change amongst the Executive Group and subsequently with their direct reports and teams.

In March 2009 the National Management Board was formed, taking the place of the Executive Group. This smaller, more tightly structured team aims to provide the direction and decision-making required to take ITSA into the next financial year with a new organisational structure in place.

The Manager Toolkit, an intranet resource for managers, was launched in July 2008, with a full-day pilot workshop conducted in November 2008, aimed at managers to help them better understand their accountabilities and responsibilities within ITSA and the APS. It is proposed to rollout these workshops throughout ITSA in 2009–10.

Through the employee opinion survey all managers were provided with feedback on their leadership behaviours to enable more targeted leadership development. They were also required to oversight the implementation of team improvement action plans with a view to improving employee motivation and morale. An improvement target was included in each manager’s Performance Development Plan. This will be monitored in the next employee opinion survey conducted in June 2009.Performance management
Increased compliance expectations for the participation in the Performance Feedback Scheme came about in 2008–09. Seventy-three per cent of employees in ITSA finalised their performance development plans by the due date, but only 46% of employees had new plans in place on time. These results remain less than satisfactory. Efforts to improve this resulted in a 97% compliance rate at the mid-cycle review in April 2009.

Learning and development
In October 2008 a learning and development framework was launched in ITSA, with a requirement for all employees to participate in 40 hours learning and development per annum. All operational business lines have developed a learning and development strategy. All employees participated in some kind of training activity, with an average of 39.74 hours per employee spent on training during 2008–09. Total expenditure on learning and development was $207,945 (excluding employee salaries) or $602,667 (including employee salaries). In addition, ITSA assisted 31 employees progress their tertiary studies in accordance with the ITSA Studies Assistance Scheme with the provision of assistance for course fees and leave.

Staffing
During the year, the number of ITSA employees reduced due to budgetary constraints in the agency. Workload continued to increase putting pressure on some business lines. At 30 June 2009, ITSA employed a total of 279 full-time equivalent (FTE) employees (293 actual headcount). This is compared with 308.4 FTE employees (323 actual headcount) at 30 June 2008. Further details of ITSA’s workforce profile are in Appendix 2.APS Values
APS Values and Code of Conduct are part of the ITSA induction process for all new starters to the agency. The APS Values and Code of Conduct were further highlighted as a key driver for leadership behaviour and decision-making as part of the Manager Toolkit intranet resource and workshop.

Workplace diversity
In January 2009, ITSA launched the new Workplace Diversity Program 2009–13. The aim of the new Diversity Program is to continue to improve on the recruitment and retention of Indigenous employees, and employees with a disability. It also commits to embedding a greater commitment to diversity in ITSA, through recognising key dates during the year including Harmony Day, NAIDOC week, and International Day of People with Disability, which was recognised in ITSA through the conduct of a new workplace diversity survey to update the records on employees with a disability. ITSA currently has 13 employees (4.5% of the workforce) who have disclosed that they have a disability.

ITSA employed three Indigenous cadets in February 2008 and these employees completed their Certificate IV in Government in December 2008. During the year ITSA also funded an Indigenous employee to participate in an interagency secondment through the Horizons programs coordinated by the APSC.

ITSA’s Collective Agreement 2006–09 assists in providing flexibilities around work life balance 13.3% of ITSA’s workforce is engaged on a part-time basis as at June 2009.Employee consultation
ITSA’s Branch and National Consultative Committees provide an opportunity for employees to be consulted on and give input into decisions that affect their working lives. Branch Consultative Committees met regularly in each location, and National Consultative Committee meetings were held in Sydney in March and June 2009.

Employment conditions and agreement making
ITSA’s current Collective Agreement 2006–09 expires on 25 September 2009. A draft new Enterprise Agreement has been circulated throughout ITSA and briefings from the Chief Executive and Director Employee Relations have been provided throughout the agency. The new agreement should be in place by September 2009.

Executive remuneration
All ITSA Senior Executive Service (SES) employees and other senior managers in ITSA have their remuneration and other conditions of employment established by individual Australian Workplace Agreements (AWAs). ITSA had a total of nine AWAs in operation at June 2009, five for SES and four for non-SES employees. ITSA’s AWAs emphasise the achievement of agreed outcomes and commit the parties to uphold and promote the APS Values and the principles contained in the ITSA CA. Salary bands available under the AWAs are included at Appendix 2. Under the new legislation and the Fair Work Act 2009, AWAs can no longer be entered into, and all employees currently on AWAs in ITSA will need to move onto another employment instrument, such as a Section 24 Determination, from 1 July 2009 or at the nominal expiry date.

Performance pay
ITSA’s CA and AWAs do not include any provision for performance-based pay or bonuses.Reward and recognition
ITSA encourages reward and recognition of employees who make an outstanding contribution. Each branch regularly provides opportunities for reward and recognition in accordance with ITSA’s Employee Recognition Program.
The recipients of the Australia Day Achievement Award for 2009 were:

Sara Saravanabhava for providing reliable support to the Official Receiver and senior managers of the Brisbane office for almost 25 years, and more recently networking with accountants to improve ITSA’s ability to attract suitable recruits.

Members of the Business Unit for significantly improving the depth of content and form of presentation of ITSA’s complex annual financial statements in 2008. Those members of the Business Unit to receive this award were:
  • Bob Morison
  • Michelle Orford
  • Jean Scheckenbach
  • Sue Boardman
  • Iain Cox
  • Trang Nguyen

Details of ITSA’s Health and Safety Management Arrangements (HSMA) are provided at Appendix 3.
Commonwealth disability strategy
Roles of government are grouped into five core areas by the Commonwealth Disability Service, namely – policy adviser, purchaser, regulator, provider and employer. In this context, ITSA fulfils all five of these core roles and has reporting responsibilities against each.

ITSA’s achievements under the employer core area during 2008–09 have involved:
  • conducting a new diversity survey in ITSA to recognise those employees with a disability
  • launching ITSA’s new Workplace Diversity Program 2009–13
  • continuing ITSA’s membership with Australian Employers Network on Disability.

4. Appendices
Appendix 1: Freedom of information
This functional statement is published to meet the requirements of Section 8 of the Freedom of Information Act 1982 (FOI Act). A general description of ITSA and its function is contained in Section 1 of this report. This statement sets out the statutory responsibilities and powers of relevant office holders under the Bankruptcy Act.

Chief Executive and Inspector-General in Bankruptcy
Functions and powers
The Chief Executive has the powers of a secretary of a department of the Australian Government.
The Chief Executive as the Inspector-General in Bankruptcy is also a statutory office holder responsible for the administration of the Bankruptcy Act. The Inspector-General has a number of statutory functions under the Act. These include the power to:
  • make such enquiries and investigations as the Attorney-General directs
  • make other enquiries and investigations as he thinks fit with respect to the conduct of a trustee in relation to a bankruptcy, or an administration under Parts IV, X or XI of the Act
  • make other enquiries and investigations as he thinks fit with respect to the conduct of a debt agreement administrator
  • make other enquiries and investigations as he thinks fit with respect to the conduct of a solicitor acting as a controlling trustee under Part X
  • make such investigations as he thinks fit with respect to so much of the conduct and examinable affairs of a bankrupt or a debtor in relation to an administration under Part IV, IX, X or XI of the Act
  • attend and participate in, but not vote at, a meeting of creditors
  • obtain from Official Receivers and other staff reports about the operation of the Act
  • oversee the conduct, trade, dealings, property and affairs of a debtor or bankrupt
  • review decisions of trustees relating to assessments of bankrupts’ income, objections and objections to early discharge
  • maintain the National Personal Insolvency Index (NPII)
  • enquire, examine, or apply to the court regarding a trustee’s conduct
  • prepare an annual report on the operation of the Act
  • be the registering authority for registered trustees
  • approve bankruptcy forms including debtors’ petitions, Statements of Affairs, trustees’ accounting statements, applications for registration as a trustee, authorities under Section 188, consents by registered trustees to act as trustee of a bankruptcy, Part X administration or trustee of a deceased debtor and proofs of debt.

The Inspector-General holds certain delegations from the Minister to assist in the administration of the Act. The delegations include giving the Inspector-General the Minister’s powers and functions with respect to the funding of trustees under Section 305 of the Act.Official Receivers
Functions and powers
The functions of the Official Receivers under the Act are to:
  • act for and on behalf of the Official Trustee in Bankruptcy (see separate entry on page 11)
  • issue bankruptcy notices
  • accept debtors’ petitions
  • maintain bankruptcy records, within the framework of the NPII
  • administer the pre-bankruptcy moratorium provisions
  • accept authorities signed by debtors under Section 188 to enable the debtor to propose to creditors an administration under Part X of the Act
  • accept debt agreements proposals for processing
  • be the repository for documents required to be filed by private trustees, such as accounts relating to the administration of estates
  • investigate, to the extent that a trustee indicates that he or she does not propose to do so, the bankrupt’s examinable affairs, or the financial affairs of an associated entity of the bankrupt insofar as they appear to be relevant to the bankrupt, or any of the bankrupt’s conduct, dealings, transactions, property and affairs
  • have access to bankrupts’ documentation and get such information from a trustee as is necessary to enable the Official Receiver to perform his or her duties
  • apply to the court to enforce an order or direction with which a bankrupt, a debtor, a trustee or other person has failed to comply under the Act
  • represent the Official Trustee at public examinations of bankrupts and apply to examine the bankrupt or other persons
  • on the requisition of a creditor, summon a meeting of creditors for the purpose of filling a vacancy in the Office of the Trustee in Bankruptcy
  • access all premises and books for any purpose of the Act, and to make copies of or take extracts from any books
  • issue notices to a person requiring that person to give information required for the Official Receiver’s functions under the Act, to attend before the Official Receiver to give evidence on oath and to produce relevant books in that person’s possession
  • issue offshore information notices where evidence about a bankrupt’s financial affairs and dealings is located in a foreign country
  • collect monies owing by way of income contribution from persons other than the bankrupt
  • recover property on behalf of trustees disposed of by a bankrupt in a transaction to defeat creditors which is void against the trustee
  • attend meetings under Part X of the Bankruptcy Act when the Official Trustee in Bankruptcy acts as controlling trustee of an administration under that part and to sign minutes of those meetings
  • notify as prescribed the making of administration orders that estates of deceased persons be administered in bankruptcy under Part XI and receive copies of Statements of Affairs filed under Part XI
  • receive copies of deceased persons’ Statements of Affairs filed by legal personal representatives.

In addition to the statutory duties stated above, the Official Receivers have administrative duties as a result of their responsibility to supervise the administration of bankruptcy generally and the activities of their branch.Categories of documents
ITSA maintains the following categories of documents:
  • internal administration papers and records, including working drafts, statistical records, copies of facsimiles, and records relating to human and financial resource management
  • ministerial, interdepartmental and general correspondence and papers
  • policy documents, including recommendations and decisions
  • documents relating to meetings (agendas, minutes and reports)
  • copies of ministerial delegations given to the Inspector-General and related correspondence
  • correspondence and papers relating to work undertaken on behalf of the Official Receivers
  • legislation and reports relating to bankruptcy law in common law jurisdictions other than Australia
  • correspondence and reports relating to the Inspector-General’s functions under Section 12 of the Bankruptcy Act
  • bankruptcy records on the NPII.
Official Trustee in Bankruptcy
Establishment
The Official Trustee is established under the Bankruptcy Act.

Organisation
The Official Trustee is a body corporate.

Functions and powers – personal insolvency
Under the Bankruptcy Act, the Official Trustee acts as:
  • the trustee of the estates of bankrupts during a vacancy in the office of private trustee of the bankrupt estate, or when a private trustee has not consented to act as a trustee
  • the administrator of debtors who have entered into a debt agreement under Part IX of the Act when a vacancy occurs in the office of debt agreement administrator
  • the trustee of the estates of debtors who have entered into a personal insolvency agreement under Part X of the Act where a vacancy occurs in the office of private trustee of the deed or composition
  • the trustee of the estate of a deceased person that is being administered in bankruptcy under the provisions of Part XI of the Act where the creditors have not appointed a private trustee.

The Official Trustee also acts as interim controller of the estate of a debtor before sequestration and when there is a vacancy in the office of controlling trustee.

The principal powers and functions of the Official Trustee, when acting as trustee of a bankrupt or deceased estate, are set out in the Act. The Official Trustee:
  • ascertains the bankrupt’s assets and liabilities and assesses the bankrupt’s income
  • takes and enforces possession of assets and records
  • is vested with the bankrupt’s property and deals with that property
  • conducts the administration of a bankruptcy in the interests of creditors
  • considers applications for departure from the income-contribution regime in cases of hardship
  • convenes meetings of creditors and secures appointment of a committee of inspection
  • seeks public examination of the bankrupt
  • keeps proper books and records and makes such returns as the Inspector-General in Bankruptcy directs
  • complies with the Inspector-General’s directions regarding banking
  • applies to the court to be released from a bankrupt estate
  • pays dividends.

When acting as a debt agreement administrator under Part IX of the Act or a trustee of a personal insolvency agreement under Part X of the Act, the Official Trustee has the functions and duties set out in the relevant agreement.

As well as acting as trustee of the estates listed above, the Official Trustee maintains an account known as the Common Investment Fund into which monies received by the Official Trustee must be paid.Functions and powers – proceeds of crime
When goods are designated as condemned or forfeited in accordance with Section 9 of the Crimes Act 1914, the Official Trustee disposes of the property and deposits the proceeds, after deduction of the Official Trustee’s costs and remuneration, into the Confiscated Assets Account, as required by Section 296 of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002. Similarly, Section 208DA of the Customs Act 1901 requires the Official Trustee to dispose of ‘narcotic-related’ goods and deposit the proceeds, after deduction of the Official Trustee’s costs and remuneration, into the Confiscated Assets Account.

The Official Trustee was provided with additional functions under the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002. Under that Act, restraining orders may be made against property of a person suspected of committing an offence. If the Official Trustee is ordered to take control and custody of that property, the office is provided with investigative and disposal powers in relation to the controlled property. In addition, the Official Trustee is able to deal appropriately with controlled property, including its destruction if it is in the public interest to do so, with the net proceeds of property disposed of by the Official Trustee being deposited to the Confiscated Assets Account after deduction of the Official Trustee’s costs and remuneration. Under the former legislation, the Proceeds of Crime Act 1987, property forfeited under Sections 20 and 30 of that Act was disposed of by the Official Trustee with the net proceeds after deduction of the Official Trustee’s costs and remuneration being deposited to the Confiscated Assets Special Account.Categories of documents
The Official Trustee maintains the following categories of documents:
Statements of Affairs lodged by bankrupts and on behalf of deceased persons whose estates are being administered in bankruptcy
  • proofs of debt lodged by creditors in relation to estates administered by the Official Trustee
  • correspondence
  • copies of court documents
  • security documents and related control records
  • financial and other documents relating to the Common Investment Fund
  • legal opinions and correspondence concerning the Official Trustee’s functions under the Customs Act and under the two Proceeds of Crime Acts.

Facilities for access
The Official Trustee does not maintain separate facilities for access.

Documents may be examined and copies obtained through the access facilities provided by ITSA.FOI procedures and initial contact points
FOI contact officers will help applicants identify the particular documents they seek. All national managers of ITSA’s business lines, together with authorised officers at ITSA’s national office in Canberra, are authorised to grant or deny access to documents. Enquiries about access to documents or other matters relating to freedom of information may be directed to any of the following addresses:
TABLE 21: FOI contact points
ITSA
Level 4
201 Elizabeth Street
Sydney NSW 2000
ITSA
1st Floor
NAB Building
315 Ross River Road
Aitkenvale QLD 4814
ITSA
4th Floor
ANZ Centre
22–26 Elizabeth Street
Hobart TAS 7001
ITSA
Level 16
300 La Trobe Street
Melbourne VIC 3000
ITSA
Level 9
80 King William Street
Adelaide SA 5000
ITSA
Level 2
NFF House
14–16 Brisbane Avenue
Canberra ACT 2600
ITSA
Level 16
340 Adelaide Street
Brisbane QLD 4000
ITSA
Level 12
Durack Centre
263 Adelaide Terrace
Perth WA 6000
FOI Coordinator
ITSA
GPO Box 821
Canberra ACT 2601
Freedom of Information statistics 2008–09
Requests
TABLE 22: FOI requests
FOI requests carried over from previous year
0
Requests received
10
Granted in full
1
Granted in part
4
Refused
1
Transferred
0
Lapsed
1
Requests outstanding at end of year
3

Review of decisions
Two requests for internal review were received in 2008–09.

FOI response times
The following table illustrates the time that elapsed in finalising requests for access.
It includes matters that were determined, withdrawn or transferred in full.

TABLE 23: FOI response times
0–30 days
5
31–60 days
1
61–90 days
0
91–days
1

Fees and charges
Requests for access to documents under the FOI Act attract a $30 application fee, which may be remitted in certain circumstances. The Act also provides for other charges to be imposed, including for the time taken to search for and retrieve documents and in making a decision whether to grant access. These charges may also be remitted in certain circumstances.

TABLE 24: FOI fees and charges
Total application fees received
$210.00
Other fees/charges imposed
$110.00

Appendix 2: Staffing profile
Employee profile
Location
ACT
NSW
VIC
QLD
SA
WA
TAS
TOTAL
Class level
30 June 08
30 June 09
30 June 08
30 June 09
30 June 08
30 June 09
30 June 08
30 June 09
30 June 08
30 June 09
30 June 08
30 June 09
30 June 08
30 June 09
30 June 08
30 June 09
APSL1–4
M
0
1
10
8
8
9
7
7
3
3
1
0
2
1
31
29
F
5
4
19
18
8
10
33
35
24
21
12
7
2
0
103
95
APSL5–6
M
3
6
14
12
11
8
15
10
3
4
6
4
3
2
55
46
F
8
8
14
13
11
8
12
8
7
5
6
7
1
2
59
51
EL1–2
M
12
11
7
6
7
7
10
12
2
2
4
3
1
1
43
42
F
7
6
7
6
3
4
5
5
3
2
0
1
0
0
25
24
M
2
1
0
0
1
2
2
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
5
SES
F
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
TOTAL
37
37
72
64
49
48
84
79
42
37
29
22
9
6
322
293
Note: Figures include ongoing, non-ongoing, full-time and part-time employees but exclude the Chief Executive

TABLE 26: Non-ongoing employees by classification group and location
Location
ACT
NSW
VIC
QLD
SA
WA
TAS
TOTAL
Class level
APSL1–4
2
1
1
8
6
0
0
18
APSL5–6
0
0
0
1
1
0
1
3
EL1–2
3
0
2
0
0
0
0
5
TOTAL
5
1
3
9
7
0
1
26
Note: Figures include full-time and part-time employees.
8.9 per cent of employees were employed on a non-ongoing basis in 2008–09.TABLE 27: Part-time employees by classification group and location
Location
ACT
NSW
VIC
QLD
SA
WA
TAS
TOTAL
Class level
APSL1–4
1
4
4
6
7
0
0
22
APSL5–6
2
3
0
0
2
1
1
9
EL1–2
3
1
3
0
1
0
0
8
TOTAL
6
8
7
6
10
1
1
39
Note: Figures include ongoing and non-ongoing employees
13.3 per cent of employees worked part-time.

TABLE 28: Salary ranges at 30 June 2009 under the Collective Agreement and AWAs
Class Level
Minimum
Maximum
APS Level 1
$37,003
$40,987
APS Level 2
$41,878
$46,439
APS Level 3
$47,699
$51,480
APS Level 4
$53,162
$57,720
APS Level 5
$59,295
$64,041
APS Level 6
$65,635
$73,567
Executive Level 1
$78,192
$99,894
Executive Level 2
$94,689
$129,792
SES Band 1
$122,068
$142,782

Appendix 3: Occupational health and safety
ITSA is committed to providing a safe and healthy workplace for all employees. The following information details our responses to our legal obligations under Section 74 of the Occupational Health and Safety (Commonwealth Employment) Act 1991.

ITSA’s Health and Safety Management Arrangements (HSMAs) aim to facilitate a direct relationship between ITSA and its employees to enable effective cooperation on health and safety matters and promote and develop appropriate measures to ensure the health, safety and welfare of employees at work.

In 2008–09, the HSMA ensured the ongoing integration of Occupational Health and Safety (OH&S) into regular consultative mechanisms convened on a quarterly basis, either through Branch Consultative Committees, or a separately constituted OH&S Committee. ITSA’s National Consultative Committee continued to consider ITSA-wide OH&S matters.

A six-monthly national OH&S report is produced and tabled with ITSA’s National Management Board and at the National Consultative Committee.

ITSA’s workers’ compensation premium for 2008–09 was 0.66% of payroll, which reflected a marginal increase from the predicted rate due to some lifetime claims from previous years. The continued effort in managing workplace safety over the past year has resulted in a reduction in the compensation premium for 2009–10 to 0.48% of payroll. This is compared to 1.25% for the overall average premium rate for the Commonwealth sector.

During the year, ITSA had no notifications under Section 68 of the Occupational Health and Safety (Commonwealth Employment) Act 1991 concerning health and safety incidences, accidents or dangerous occurrences. No notices were issued under Sections 29, 46 or 47 of the Act. In addition, no investigations were conducted.
Appendix 4: Consultancy services
Policy on selection and engagement of consultants
Consultants were engaged where specialist skills were not available within ITSA, or where staff or in-house resources were limited. Each engagement is supported by evidence that the work is essential to ITSA and/or government objectives. The engagement must be essential to administrative efficiency and likely to achieve a significant tangible result. ITSA’s Chief Executive Instructions require that due consideration be given to the consultancy services procurement process. The process must promote public and effective competition, maintain ethics and fair dealing, and provide value for money.

Typically, consultants employed by ITSA are entities (individuals, partnerships or corporations) engaged to provide professional independent and expert advice or services to:
  • diagnose a defined issue or problem
  • carry out a specific task
  • carry out defined research, reviews or valuations
  • provide independent advice, information or creative solutions to assist decision-making.

TABLE 29: Summary of consultancies 2008–09
Number of consultancies
13
Total expenditure on consultancy services (continuing and new consultancies)
$549,566 GST inclusive
Note: These figures do not include details of contractors such as those engaged through employment agencies for short-term relief or other purposes.Details of consultancy contracts to the value of $10,000 or more let during 2008–09
TABLE 30: Consultancy contracts
Name of consultantPurpose
Contract price (GST incl)
Selection key
Justification key
Biz3IT Consultancy
eSolve
$55,619
c
A
EMC GlobalIT Consultancy
EDRMS
$265,603
a
A
Flavour SolutionsIT Consultancy
eSolve
$22,704
c
C
Insight SRCConduct the 2008 employee opinion survey
$49,951
b
A
Insight SRCConduct the 2009 employee opinion survey
$51,799
b
A
John FarrellProvide editorial and research assistance for the history of bankruptcy administration
$86,194
c
A
KPMGInternal auditing
$1,160,000
a
C
Measured InsightsConduct the DAS client survey
$26,950
c
A
Measured InsightsConduct the client opinion survey
$46,200
b
A
Michael Kean & AssociatesProvide advice for eSolve project.
$106,767
c
A
OaktonIT probity and consultancy services
$139,950
c
C
Peter KennedyInternal audit guidance
$28,314
c
A
RaveCommMedia services
$61,816
c
A
Selection key
a. Public tender
b. Selective tender
c. Direct engagement of a consultant who had previously undertaken closely related work for the agency

Justification key
A. Special skills not available within the agency
B. Special skills available within the agency but consultant engaged because of staff resource priorities
C. Need for independent study or assessment.

Information on expenditure on contracts and consultancies is also available on the AusTender website www.tenders.gov.au.
Appendix 5: Advertising and market research
Section 311A of the Commonwealth Electoral Act 1918 requires ITSA to disclose payments to specific types of organisations. The organisations are categorised into advertising agencies, market research organisations, polling organisations, direct mail organisations, and media advertising organisations.

During 2008–09, ITSA has contracted the following advertising and market research organisations:
  • Insight SRC for $51,799 to implement ITSA’s employee opinion surveys and follow-up actions
  • Master Placement Agency hma Blaze for recruitment media advertising to the value of $43,366
  • Measured Insights at a cost of $46,200 for the conduct of the 2009 ITSA Client Opinion Survey
  • Measured Insights for $26,950 for the conduct of the debt agreement client survey.

Appendix 6: Ecologically sustainable development and environmental performance
The following information is presented in accordance with s.516A of the Environmental Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (the EPBC Act).

Ecologically Sustainable Development (ESD)
During 2008–09, ITSA has remained committed to the principles of ESD. ITSA does not administer programs or legislation relating to ESD or the environment and therefore, the direct impact of our activities on the environment is essentially confined to the operation of our leased office accommodation.

The most effective means of reducing this impact is to emphasise more efficient use of space in new tenancies, and to improve the energy efficiency in established tenancies. ITSA’s new accommodation in Sydney and the newly refurbished national office in Canberra incorporate many new environmental initiatives for energy, such as the implementation of T6 lighting; movement-activated controls; improved waste reduction through the removal of personal waste paper bins and increased co-mingle and paper recycling bins.

The Chief Executive issued a revised Environmental Policy in May 2008, which included a commitment to best practice and the latest environmental targets required in government operations. Some of ITSA’s objectives were to reduce waste sent to landfill by 90% by 2010 and for all motor vehicles to be Green Vehicle Guide 3.5 star rated or higher by 2010.

Environmental Management System
ITSA continues to develop its innovative intranet-based Environmental Management System (EMS) to improve environmental performance by developing strategies and targets. Since its implementation a number of initiatives have been introduced.

The EMS management team last reviewed ITSA’s energy consumption in October 2008. ITSA’s total energy use for tenant light and power of 9,533 megajoules per person is well below the 2003–04 government target of 10,000 megajoules per person and with further projected savings, the 2011–12 target of 7,500 megajoules per person should be achievable by ITSA.
5. Financial Statements
Independent Auditor’s Report
Independent Auditor’s Report Page1
Independent Auditor’s Report Page2


Statement by the Chief Executive and Chief Finance Officer

INCOME STATEMENT
For the year ended 30 June 2009
Notes
2009
2008
$’000
$’000
INCOME
Revenue
Revenue from Government
3A
36,317
36,701
Sale of goods and rendering of services
3B
1,104
1,243
Other revenue
3C
1,549
1,705
Total revenue
38,970
39,649
Gains
Other gains
3D
189
219
Total gains
189
219
TOTAL INCOME
39,159
39,868
EXPENSES
Employee benefits
4A
23,067
23,197
Suppliers
4B
14,151
14,878
Depreciation and amortisation
4C
1,848
1,688
Losses from asset sales
4D
-
2
Finance costs
4E
41
45
TOTAL EXPENSES
39,107
39,810
SURPLUS ATTRIBUTABLE TO THE AUSTRALIAN GOVERNMENT
52
58
The above statement should be read in conjunction with the accompanying notes.BALANCE SHEET
As at 30 June 2009
Notes
2009
2008
$’000
$’000
ASSETS
Financial Assets
Cash and cash equivalents
5A
761
823
Trade and other receivables
5B
3,228
6,807
Total financial assets
3,989
7,630
Non-Financial Assets
Land and buildings
6A,C
3,779
3,395
Infrastructure, plant and equipment
6B,C
1,530
1,122
Intangibles
6D
5,387
2,473
Other non-financial assets
6E
525
455
Total non-financial assets
11,221
7,445
TOTAL ASSETS
15,210
15,075
LIABILITIES
Payables
Suppliers
7A
292
263
Other payables
7B
1,583
1,653
Total payables
1,875
1,916
Provisions
Employee provisions
8A
5,949
5,806
Other provisions
8B
624
632
Total provisions
6,573
6,438
TOTAL LIABILITIES
8,448
8,354
NET ASSETS
6,762
6,721
EQUITY
Contributed equity
2,890
2,890
Reserves
1,031
1,042
Retained surpluses
2,841
2,789
TOTAL EQUITY
6,762
6,721
Current assets
4,514
8,085
Non-current assets
10,696
6,990
Current liabilities
6,731
6,753
Non-current liabilities
1,717
1,601
The above statement should be read in conjunction with the accompanying notes.STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN EQUITY
For the year ended 30 June 2009
Accumulated Results
Asset Revaluation Reserve
Contributed Equity/Capital
Total Equity
2009
2008
2009
2008
2009
2008
2009
2008
$’000
$’000
$’000
$’000
$’000
$’000
$’000
$’000
Opening balance
2,789
2,731
1,042
1,120
2,890
2,890
6,721
6,741
Adjustment for changes in accounting policies
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Adjusted opening balance
2,789
2,731
1,042
1,120
2,890
2,890
6,721
6,741
Income and expense
Revaluation adjustment
-
-
(11)
(78)
-
-
(11)
(78)
Subtotal income and expenses recognised directly in equity
-
-
(11)
(78)
-
-
(11)
(78)
Surplus for the period
52
58
-
-
-
-
52
58
Total income and expenses
2,841
2,789
1,031
1,042
2,890
2,890
6,762
6,721
Transactions with owners
Return of capital
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Contributions by Owners
Appropriation (equity injections)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Closing balance attributable to the Australian Government
2,841
2,789
1,031
1,042
2,890
2,890
6,762
6,721
The above statement should be read in conjunction with the accompanying notes.CASH FLOW STATEMENT
For the year ended 30 June 2009
Notes
2009
2008
$’000
$’000
OPERATING ACTIVITES
Cash received
Goods and services
1,448
1,356
Appropriations
38,506
37,962
Net GST received from ATO
1,761
1,387
Other receipts
1,471
1,842
Total cash received
43,186
42,547
Cash used
Employees
23,019
22,726
Suppliers
15,940
16,654
Other payments
-
-
Total cash used
38,959
39,380
Net cash from or (used by)

operating activities

9
4,227
3,167
INVESTING ACTIVITES
Cash received
Proceeds from sales of property, plant and equipment
2
1
Total cash received
2
1
Cash used
Purchase of property, plant and equipment
2,265
1,578
Purchase of intangibles
3,274
1,524
Payment of make-good
-
138
Total cash used
5,539
3,240
Net cash from or (used by) investing activities
(5,537)
(3,239)
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Cash received
Capital injections
1,248
332
Total cash received
1,248
332
Net cash from or (used by) financing activities
1,248
332
Net increase or (decrease) in cash held
(62)
260
Cash at the beginning of the reporting period
823
563
Cash at the end of the reporting period
5A
761
823
The above statement should be read in conjunction with the accompanying notes.
SCHEDULE OF COMMITMENTS
As at 30 June 2009
Notes
2009
2008
$’000
$’000
BY TYPE
Commitments receivable
Sublease rental income
(228)
(304)
GST recoverable on commitments
(1,858)
(1,509)
Total commitments receivable
(2,086)
(1,813)
Capital commitments
Property, plant & equipment
1,027
719
Total capital commitments
1,027
719
Other commitments
Operating leases
19,506
15,270
Other suppliers
900
618
Total other commitments
20,406
15,888
Net commitments by type
19,347
14,794
BY MATURITY
Capital commitments
One year or less
1,027
719
From one to five years
-
-
Over five years
-
-
Total capital commitments
1,027
719
Operating lease commitments
One year or less
3,739
2,863
From one to five years
11,022
7,694
Over five years
4,745
4,713
Total operating lease commitments
19,506
15,270
Other suppliers commitments
One year or less
900
616
From one to five years
-
2
Over five years
-
-
Total other suppliers commitments
900
618
Commitments receivable
One year or less
(521)
(458)
From one to five years
(1,134)
(927)
Over five years
(431)
(428)
Total commitments receivable
(2,086)
(1,813)
Net commitments by maturity
19,347
14,794
NB: Commitments are GST inclusive where relevant.

The above schedule should be read in conjunction with the accompanying notes.

1. Operating leases are effectively non-cancellable and comprise:
Nature of leaseGeneral description of leasing arrangement
Leases for office accommodation• Some lease payments are subject to regular increases in accordance with rent reviews; others are subject to pre-determined percentage increases.

• For some office accommodation leases, the initial periods are still current and each may be renewed for up to 5 years at ITSA’s option, following a once-off adjustment of rentals to current market levels. Other accommodation leases are currently in their final renewal and new accommodation will be sought at the end of the lease term.

Agreements for the provision of motor vehicles to senior executive officers• No contingent rentals exist.

• There are no renewal or purchase options available to ITSA.

The above statement should be read in conjunction with the accompanying notes.
SCHEDULE OF CONTINGENCIES
As at 30 June 2009
Guarantees
Claims for damages/costs
Total
2009
2008
2009
2008
2009
2008
$’000
$’000
$’000
$’000
$’000
$’000
Contingent liabilities
Balance from previous period
-
-
-
80
-
80
New
-
-
-
-
-
-
Re-measurement
-
-
-
-
-
-
Liabilities crystallised
-
-
-
(80)
-
(80)
Obligations expired
-
-
-
-
-
-
Total contingent liabilities
-
-
-
-
-
-
Contingent assets
Balance from previous period
-
-
-
-
-
-
New
-
-
-
-
-
-
Re-measurement
-
-
-
-
-
-
Assets crystallised
-
-
-
-
-
-
Expired
-
-
-
-
-
-
Total contingent assets
-
-
-
-
-
-
Net contingent liabilities
-
-
-
-
-
-

SCHEDULE OF ADMINISTERED ITEMS
Notes
2009
2008
$’000
$’000
Income Administered on Behalf of Government
for the year ended 30 June 2009
Revenue
Taxation revenue
Charges
15A
7,526
8,562
Total taxation revenue
7,526
8,562
Non-taxation revenue
Interest
15B
775
1,087
Other sources of non-taxation revenue
15C
19,756
23,809
Total non-taxation revenue
20,531
24,896
Total revenue administered on behalf of Government
28,057
33,458
Income Administered on Behalf of Government
28,057
33,458
Notes
2009
2008
$’000
$’000
Assets Administered on Behalf of Government
as at 30 June 2009
Financial assets
Cash
16A
10,996
5,620
Receivables
16B
4,123
4,900
15,119
10,520
Financial forfeited proceeds of crime assets held for realisation
Other investments
16C
-
2
Non-current forfeited proceeds of crime assets held for realisation
Land and buildings
16C
10,406
9,799
Other non-financial assets
16C
4,175
4,193
14,581
13,992
Total assets administered on behalf of Government
29,700
24,514
Liabilities Administered on Behalf of Government
as at 30 June 2009
Payables and provisions
Other payables
17A
75
145
Other provisions
17B
25,541
19,008
Total liabilities administered on behalf of Government
25,616
19,153
Current assets
29,700
24,514
Non-current assets
-
-
Current liabilities
25,616
19,153
Non-current liabilities
-
-
Notes
2009
2008
$’000
$’000
Administered Cash Flows
for the year ended 30 June 2009
Operating activities
Cash received
Charges
6,631
6,987
Interest
775
1,087
Other receipts
22,810
26,620
Total cash received
30,216
34,694
Cash used
Refunds of Administered revenues
258
493
Other – GST paid to ATO
1,194
949
Total cash used
1,452
1,442
Net cash from or (used by) operating activities
28,764
33,252
Investing activities
Cash received
Cash received from acquisition and disposal of forfeited proceeds of crime assets
20,156
16,586
Total cash received
20,156
16,586
Cash used
Forfeited proceeds of crime assets distributed
14,210
15,390
Total cash used
14,210
15,390
Net cash from or (used by) investing activities
5,946
1,196
Net increase or (decrease) in cash held
34,710
34,448
Administered Cash Flows
Cash at the beginning of the reporting period
5,620
4,104
Cash from the Official Public Account for refunds of Administered revenues
2,238
1,522
Cash to the Official Public Account
(31,572)
(34,454)
Cash at the end of the reporting period
10,996
5,620
Administered Contingent Liabilities
Administered Commitments
ITSA has no administered commitments as at 30 June for the years covered by these financial statements.
Administered Contingencies
ITSA had no administered contingencies as at 30 June 2009 (30 June 2008: nil).
The above schedule should be read in conjunction with the accompanying notes.
Notes to and forming part of the Financial Statements
For the year ended 30 June 2009
Table of Contents
Note 1: Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Note 2: Events after the Balance Sheet Date
Note 3: Income
Note 4: Expenses
Note 5: Financial Assets
Note 6: Non-Financial Assets
Note 7: Payables - Suppliers
Note 8: Provisions
Note 9: Cash Flow Reconciliation
Note 10: Contingent Liabilities and Assets
Note 11: Executive Remuneration
Note 12: Remuneration of Auditors
Note 13: Staff at Reporting Date
Note 14: Financial Instruments
Note 15: Income Administered on Behalf of Government
Note 16: Assets Administered on Behalf of Government
Note 17: Liabilities Administered on Behalf of Government
Note 18: Administered Reconciliation Table
Note 19: Administered Financial Instruments
Note 20: Appropriations
Note 21: Special Accounts
Note 22: Trust Moneys
Note 23: Other Trust Moneys and Assets Held in Trust
Note 24: Compensation and Debt Relief
Note 25: Reporting of Outcomes
Note 1: Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
1.1 Objectives of Insolvency and Trustee Service Australia
Insolvency and Trustee Service Australia (ITSA) is responsible for the administration and regulation of the personal insolvency system in Australia, pursuant to the Bankruptcy Act 1966 and related bankruptcy legislation. ITSA also has a role in administering property and assets under the proceeds of crime legislation.

ITSA’s outcome is a personal insolvency system that produces equitable outcomes for debtors and creditors, enjoys public confidence and minimises the impact of financial failure on the community.

Agency activities contributing towards this outcome are classified as either departmental or administered. Departmental activities involve the use of assets, liabilities, income and expenses controlled or incurred by ITSA in its own right. Administered activities involve the management or oversight by ITSA on behalf of the Government of items controlled or incurred by Government.

Departmental activities are identified under the following six outputs:
    Output 1.1: Personal insolvency laws which satisfy business and community needs (transferred to the Attorney General’s department 1 February 2009);
    Output 1.2: A bankruptcy registry service and compliance with the Bankruptcy Act;
    Output 1.3: Regulation of bankruptcy trustees and debt agreement administrators;
    Output 1.4: Administration of bankrupt estates and other arrangements under the Bankruptcy Act;
    Output 1.5: Investigation of Bankruptcy Act offences;
    Output 1.6: Administration of proceeds of crime property.

The continued existence of ITSA in its present form and with its present programs is dependent on Government policy and on continuing appropriations by Parliament for ITSA’s administration and programs.1.2 Basis of Preparation of the Financial Report
The financial statements and notes are required by section 49 of the Financial Management and Accountability Act 1997 and are a general-purpose financial report.

The financial statements and notes have been prepared in accordance with:
  • Finance Minister’s Orders (or FMO’s) for reporting periods ending on or after 1 July 2008; and
  • Australian Accounting Standards and Interpretations issued by the Australian Accounting Standards Board (AASB) that apply for the reporting period.

The financial report has been prepared on an accrual basis and is in accordance with the historical cost convention, except for certain assets at fair value. Except where stated, no allowance is made for the effect of changing prices on the results or the financial position.

The financial report is presented in Australian dollars and values rounded to the nearest thousand dollars unless disclosure of the full amount is specifically required.
Unless an alternative treatment is specifically required by an Accounting Standard or the FMO’s, assets and liabilities are recognised in the Balance Sheet when and only when it is probable that future economic benefits will flow to ITSA or a future sacrifice of economic benefits will be required and the amounts of the assets or liabilities can be reliably measured. However, assets and liabilities arising under agreements equally proportionately unperformed are not recognised unless required by an Accounting Standard. Liabilities and assets that are unrealised are reported in the Schedule of Commitments and the Schedule of Contingencies.

Unless an alternative treatment is specifically required by an Accounting Standard, revenues and expenses are recognised in the Income Statement when and only when the flow or consumption or loss of economic benefits has occurred and can be reliably measured.

Administered revenues, expenses, assets and liabilities and cash flows reported in the Schedule of Administered Items and related notes are accounted for on the same basis and using the same policies as for departmental items, except where otherwise stated in Note 1.21.

1.3 Significant Accounting Judgements and Estimates
No accounting assumptions or estimates have been identified that have a significant risk of causing a material adjustment to carrying amounts of assets and liabilities within the next accounting period.

1.4 Statement of Compliance
No new standards, amendments to standards or interpretations issued by the Australian Accounting Standards Board are estimated to have a material financial impact in the 2008-09 or future reporting periods. 1.5 Revenue
Revenues from Government
Amounts appropriated for Departmental outputs appropriations for the year (adjusted for any formal additions and reductions) are recognised as revenue when the Agency gains control of the appropriation, except for certain amounts that relate to activities that are reciprocal in nature, in which case revenue is recognised only when it has been earned.

Appropriations receivable are recognised at their nominal amounts.

Other Types of Revenue
Revenue from the sale of goods is recognised when:
  • the risks and rewards of ownership have been transferred to the buyer;
  • ITSA retains no managerial involvement nor effective control over the goods;
  • the revenue and costs incurred for the transaction can be reliably measured; and
  • it is probable that the economic benefits associated with the transaction will flow to ITSA.

Revenue from rendering of services is recognised by reference to the stage of completion of contracts at the reporting date. The revenue is recognised when:
  • the amount of revenue, stage of completion and transaction costs incurred can be reliably measured; and
  • the probable economic benefits with the transaction have flowed to ITSA.

Receivables for goods and services, which have 30 day terms, are recognised at the nominal amounts due less any impairment allowance. Collectability of debts is reviewed at balance date. Allowances are made when the collectability of the debt is no longer probable.

Interest revenue is recognised using the effective interest method as set out in AASB 139 Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement.1.6 Gains
Resources Received Free of Charge
Resources received free of charge are recognised as revenue when and only when a fair value can be reliably determined and the services would have been purchased if they had not been donated. The use of those resources is recognised as an expense.

Contributions of assets at no cost of acquisition or for normal consideration are recognised as gains at their fair value when the asset qualifies for recognition, unless received from another government agency as a consequence of a restructuring administrative arrangement.

Resources received free of charge are recorded as either revenues or gains depending on their nature.

Sale of Assets
Gains from disposal of non-current assets is recognised when control of the asset has passed to the buyer.1.7 Transactions with the Government as Owner
Equity Injections
Amounts appropriated which are designated as ‘equity injections’ for a year (less any formal reductions) are recognised directly in Contributed Equity in that year.

Restructuring of Administrative Arrangements
Net assets received from or relinquished to another Australian Government agency or authority under a restructuring of administrative arrangements are adjusted at their book value directly against contributed equity.

1.8 Employee Benefits
Liabilities for services rendered by employees are recognised at the reporting date to the extent that they have not been settled.

Liabilities for ‘short term employee benefits’ (as defined in AASB 119) and termination benefits due within twelve months of balance date are measured at their nominal amounts. The nominal amount is calculated with regard to the rates expected to be paid on settlement of the liability.

All other employee benefit liabilities are measured as the present value of the estimated future cash outflows to be made in respect of services provided by employees up to the reporting date.

Leave
The liability for employee benefits includes provision for annual leave and long service leave. No provision has been made for sick leave as all sick leave is non-vesting and the average sick leave taken in future years by employees of ITSA is estimated to be less than the annual entitlement for sick leave.

The leave liabilities are calculated on the basis of employees’ remuneration, including ITSA’s employer superannuation contribution rates to the extent that the leave is likely to be taken during service rather than paid out on termination.

The liability for long service leave has been determined using the Australian Government’s shorthand method as at 30 June 2009. The estimate of the present value of the liability takes into account attrition rates and pay increases through promotion and inflation.Separation and Redundancy
Provision is made for separations and redundancy benefit payments. ITSA recognises a provision for termination when it has informed those employees affected that it will carry out the terminations.

Superannuation
Staff of ITSA are members of the Commonwealth Superannuation Scheme (CSS), the Public Sector Superannuation Scheme (PSS), the PSS Accumulation Plan (PSSap) or another superannuation fund of the employee’s choice. The CSS and PSS are defined benefit schemes for the Australian Government. New employees (from 1 July 2005) are eligible to join the new PSS Accumulation Scheme which is a defined contribution scheme or another superannuation fund of the employee’s choice.

The liability for their superannuation benefits is recognised in the financial statements of the Australian Government and is settled by the Australian Government in due course.

ITSA makes employer contributions to the employee superannuation scheme at rates determined by an actuary to be sufficient to meet the cost to the Government of the superannuation entitlements of ITSA’s employees. ITSA accounts for the contributions as if they were contributions to defined contributions plans.

The liability for superannuation recognised at 30 June 2009 represents outstanding contributions for the final fortnight of the year.1.9 Leases
A distinction is made between finance leases and operating leases. Finance leases effectively transfer from the lessor to the lessee substantially all the risks and rewards incidental to ownership of leased non-current assets. An operating lease is a lease that is not a finance lease. In operating leases, the lessor effectively retains substantially all such risks and benefits.

Where a non-current asset is acquired by means of a finance lease, the asset is capitalised at either the fair value of the lease property or, if lower, the present value of minimum lease payments at the beginning of the lease term. A liability is recognised at the same time and for the same amount. The discount rate used is the interest rate implicit in the lease. Leased assets are amortised over the period of the lease. Lease payments are allocated between the principal component and the interest expense.

Operating lease payments are expensed on a straight line basis unless another systematic approach is more representative of the pattern of benefits derived from the leased assets.1.10 Borrowing Costs
All borrowing costs are expensed as incurred.

1.11 Cash
Cash and cash equivalents includes notes and coins held and any deposits in bank accounts with an original maturity of 3 months or less that are readily convertible to known amounts of cash and subject to insignificant risk of changes in value. Cash is recognised at its nominal amount.

1.12 Financial Assets
ITSA classifies its financial assets in the following categories:
  • ‘held-to-maturity financial assets’
  • ‘loans and receivables’
  • ‘available-for-sale financial assets’ (none held).

The classification depends on the nature and purpose of the financial assets and is determined at the time of initial recognition.

Financial assets are recognised and derecognised upon ‘trade date’.Loans and receivables
For ITSA trade receivables that have fixed or determinable payments that are not quoted in an active market are classified as ‘loans and receivables’. They are included in current assets, except for maturities greater than 12 months after the balance sheet date. These are classified as non-current assets. They are measured at amortised cost using the effective interest method less impairment.

Effective interest method
The effective interest method is a method of calculating the amortised cost of a financial asset and of allocating interest income over the relevant period. The effective interest rate is the rate that exactly discounts estimated future cash receipts over the expected life of the financial asset, or, where appropriate, a shorter period.

Income is recognised on an effective interest rate basis except for financial assets ‘at fair value through profit or loss’.

Financial assets are derecognised when the contractual rights to the cash flow from the financial assets expire or the asset is transferred to another entity. In the case of a transfer to another entity, it is necessary that the risk and rewards of ownership are also transferred.

ITSA’s activities expose it to normal commercial financial risk. As a result of ITSA’s internal policies and related Australian Government policies, ITSA’s exposure to market, credit, liquidity and cash flow and fair value interest rate risk is considered to be low.Impairment of financial assets
Financial assets are assessed for impairment at each balance date. If there is objective evidence that an impairment loss has occurred for loans and receivables or held-to-maturity investments held at amortised cost, then the amount of the loss is measured as the difference between the asset’s carrying amount and the present value of estimated future cash flows discounted at the asset’s original effective interest rate. The carrying amount is reduced by way of an allowance account.
The loss is recognised in the income statement.

ITSA does not have any impairment loss for this financial year.

1.13 Financial Liabilities
These comprise:

Supplier and other payables
Supplier and other payables are recognised at amortised cost. Liabilities are recognised to the extent that the goods or services have been received (irrespective of having been invoiced).

Other financial liabilities
Other financial liabilities are initially measured at fair value, net of transaction costs. They are then subsequently measured at amortised cost using the effective interest method, with interest expense recognised on an effective yield basis. For financial liabilities the effective interest method is equivalent to the method for financial assets.

Financial liabilities are derecognised when the obligation under the contract is discharged, cancelled or expires.

1.14 Contingent Liabilities and Contingent Assets
Contingent liabilities and assets are not recognised in the Balance Sheet but are reported in the relevant schedules and notes. They may arise from uncertainty as to the existence of a liability or asset, or represent an existing liability or asset in respect of which settlement is not probable or the amount cannot be reliably measured. Remote contingencies are part of this disclosure. Contingent assets are reported when settlement is probable, and contingent liabilities are recognised when settlement is greater than remote.1.15 Acquisition of Assets
Assets are recorded at cost of acquisition except as stated elsewhere in Note 1. The cost of acquisition includes the fair value of assets transferred in exchange and liabilities undertaken.

Assets acquired at no cost, or for nominal consideration, are initially recognised as assets and revenues at their fair value at the date of acquisition, unless acquired as a consequence of restructuring of administrative arrangements. In the latter case, assets are initially recognised as contributions by owners at the amounts at which they were recognised in the transferor agency’s accounts immediately prior to the restructuring.

1.16 Property, Plant and Equipment
Asset Recognition Threshold
Purchases of property, plant and equipment are recognised initially at cost in the Balance Sheet, except for purchases costing less than $2,000, which are expensed in the year of acquisition (other than where they form part of a group of similar items which are significant in total).

The initial cost of an asset includes an estimate of dismantling and removing the item and restoring the site on which it is located. This is particularly relevant to ‘make-good’ provisions in property leases taken up by ITSA where there exists an obligation to restore the property to its original condition. These costs are included in the value of ITSA’s leasehold improvements with a corresponding provision for the ‘make-good’ taken up.

Revaluations
Fair values for each class of asset are determined as shown below:
Asset classFair value measured at:
Leasehold improvementsDepreciated replacement cost
Property, plant and equipmentMarket selling price
Following initial recognition at cost, leasehold improvements, property plant and equipment are carried at fair value less accumulated depreciation and accumulated impairment losses. Valuations are conducted with sufficient frequency to ensure that the carrying amounts of assets do not materially differ with the assets’ fair values as at the reporting date. The regularity of independent valuations depends upon the volatility of movements in market values for the relevant assets. In between independent valuations, an assessment is made of the continuing relevance of the previous valuation.

There was an independent valuation undertaken on all asset classes as at 30 June 2008 by the Australian Valuation Office. Revaluation adjustments are made on a class basis. Any revaluations increment is credited to equity under the heading of asset revaluation reserve except to the extent that it reverses a previous revaluation decrement of the same asset class that was previously recognised through the income statement. Revaluation decrements for a class of assets are recognised directly through the income statement except to the extent that they reverse a previous revaluation increment for that class.

Any accumulated depreciation as at the revaluation date is eliminated against the gross carrying amount of the asset and the net amount restated to the revalued amount of the asset.Depreciation
Depreciable property, plant and equipment assets are written-off to their estimated residual values over their estimated useful lives using, in all cases, the straight line-method of depreciation. Leasehold improvements are depreciated on a straight-line over the lesser of the estimated useful life of the improvements or the unexpired period of the lease.

Depreciation rates (useful lives), residual values and methods are reviewed at each reporting date and necessary adjustments are recognised in the current, or current and future reporting periods, as appropriate.

Depreciation rates applying to each class of depreciable assets are based on the following useful lives:
2009
2008
Leasehold improvements
Lease term
Lease term
Property, plant and equipment
4 to 10 years
4 to 10 years
The aggregate amount of depreciation allocated for each class of asset during the reporting period is disclosed in Note 4C.

Impairment
All assets were assessed for impairment at 30 June 2009. Where indications of impairment exist, the asset’s recoverable amount is estimated and an impairment adjustment made if the asset’s recoverable amount is less than its carrying amount.

The recoverable amount of an asset is the higher of its fair value less costs to sell and its value in use. Value in use is the present value of future cash flows expected to be derived from the asset. Where the future economic benefit of an asset is not primarily dependent on the asset’s ability to generate future cash flows, and the asset would be replaced if ITSA were deprived of the asset, its value in use is taken to be its depreciated replacement cost.1.17 Intangibles
ITSA’s intangibles comprise internally developed and externally purchased software for internal use. These assets are carried at cost.

Software is amortised on a straight-line basis over its anticipated useful life. The useful life of ITSA’s software is between 1 and 7 years (2008: between 1 and 7 years)

All software assets were assessed for indications of impairment as at 30 June 2009.

1.18 Taxation
ITSA is exempt from all forms of taxation except fringe benefits tax (FBT) and the goods and services tax (GST).

Revenues, expenses and assets are recognised net of GST:
  • except where the amount of GST incurred is not recoverable from the Australian Taxation Office; and
  • except for receivables and payables.
1.19 Reporting of Administered Activities
Administered revenues, expenses, assets, liabilities and cash flows are disclosed in the Schedule of Administered Items and related Notes.

Except where otherwise stated below, administered items are accounted for on the same basis and using the same policies as for ITSA items, including the application of Australian Accounting Standards.

Revenue
All administered revenues are revenues relating to the core operating activities performed by ITSA on behalf of the Australian Government.

Administered revenue includes remuneration and fees for work done by the Official Trustee and Official Receivers under the Bankruptcy Act 1966, and under the proceeds of crime legislation. Under the Bankruptcy (Estate Charges) Act 1997, interest earned on trust funds administered by private bankruptcy trustees and a realisations charge imposed on amounts received by all bankruptcy trustees are payable to the Official Public Account. ITSA’s fees and charges are set in accordance with the Government’s formal cost recovery policy, with the results of ITSA’s reviews of fees and charges being promulgated via Cost Recovery Impact Statements.

Assets and Liabilities
Under Proceeds of Crime legislation, the Official Trustee (a body corporate) may take custody and control of a defendant’s assets while a court case is proceeding. If the court awards in favour of the Commonwealth, the defendant’s assets may be “forfeited” to the Commonwealth. Those forfeited assets are disclosed as Administered assets held for sale. Where the assets have been forfeited to the Commonwealth, then the assets are no longer held in a trustee capacity and are disposed of by ITSA unless there are undecided claims before the court by third parties to the property. The reported values for the assets reflect the latest asset valuation. The initial valuation relies upon available information e.g. court affidavits. ITSA then obtains independent valuations.

That same legislation requires that net proceeds from asset realisations be transferred to either the Confiscated Assets Account or the Confiscated Assets Special Account, and an amount is provided for in the Schedule of Administered items for that transfer.
Cash Received and Used
Fees, charges and interest collected by ITSA for use by the Australian Government rather than by ITSA are Administered revenue. Collections are transferred to the Official Public Account (OPA) maintained by the Department of Finance and Deregulation. Conversely, cash is drawn from the OPA to make payments under Parliamentary appropriation on behalf of Government. These transfers to and from the OPA are adjustments to the Administered cash held by ITSA on behalf of the Government, and reported as such in the Statement of Cash Flows in the Schedule of Administered Items and in the Administered Reconciliation table in Note 19.

The Statement of Cash Flows also discloses the cash movement associated with Proceeds of Crime forfeited assets.
1.20 Assets Vested under Bankruptcy Legislation
Under the Bankruptcy Act 1966, ITSA (fulfilling the role of the Official Trustee) takes possession of all divisible (or non-exempt) property of a bankrupt where it is trustee of the bankrupt estate, with the intention of dealing with that property in accordance with that Act.

Amounts which have been realised for the property are paid into the Common Investment Fund, pending application of those proceeds to creditors, expenses and other payments in accordance with the Act. Details of the Common Investment Fund are included in Note 23.

Assets that have vested, for which proceeds have not yet been paid into the Common Investment Fund, are reported at Note 24. The gross value of assets represents the value of assets based on the bankrupt’s estimated fair value at the time of completing the Statement of Affairs, and adjustments to that estimated value subsequently made by the Official Trustee. As ITSA deals with that property then its realisable value progressively crystallises. The net value represents the value of assets available for the benefit of creditors after consideration of mortgages and other securities over these assets. Assets acquired represent assets that have come under the control of the Official Trustee, or have been reactivated for investigation by the Official Trustee. Assets disposed represent assets that the Official Trustee no longer has an interest in.1.21 Assets Seized under Proceeds of Crime Legislation
The Proceeds of Crime Act 1987 (POC Act 1987), the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 (POC Act 2002), the Customs Act 1901 and the Crimes Act 1914 make provision in relation to, amongst other things, the seizure, forfeiture and condemnation of articles and goods, as the case may be. ITSA administers real and personal property which has been seized or restrained under these Acts.

ITS